sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Here I am 26 days later effectively repeating the meme because I've started writing a project on Rust

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

No they probably wanted to hear how great some random Arch derivatives that does that thing 3 people are talking about

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not comfortable that Fedora and derivatives give the same stability opportunity as Atomic distros

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Atomic distros + distrobox/toolbx. Bluefin is a good start for general desktop or Bazzite for gaming (But Bluefin can be more stable, I use it for some games with steam in flatpak). If something breaks roll back to any release in the last 90 days with a single command. Install all of your packages in a distrobox (Arch if you need it). Otherwise in general Fedora is pretty good.

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't understand how "appalled" being strong language is so controversial, maybe everyone here is just a rude little shit.

I would have worded it like so:

Hi, I'm concerned about the BLOBs used in this repo as they are a security risk, making the code less auditable. It looks like we could generate these BLOBs in a github action or something so we can keep the fast build process while making it easier to audit the code. I'm not exactly sure how to go about this myself but I've done similar things in other projects, maybe you could point me in the right direction as I am unfamiliar with the ventoy build process? Thanks for the really cool project, and hopefully we can sort this out easily. Looking forward to your response.

I did it with less anger and entitlement and in less words

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

I’m not saying don’t criticise it. It’s about communication. The language isn’t very good. See my other comments

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Is this not rude:

I checked the code and I’m appalled. There are more BLOBs than source code

And this:

I understand that removing BLOBs isn't a priority over new and shiny features. But due to recent events, this should be rethought.

We didn’t like it when MS made an issue trying to direct ffmpeg

They should have opened with a complement or asked for directions if they didn’t know. In this message “Thank You” means fuck all

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone -2 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't say they're wrong it's the way they communicated which I found off-putting and Gordon Ramsay -esque

[-] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone -5 points 3 weeks ago

I mean if I got an issue that sounded that entitled and this is something I do in my spare time, I'd probably ignore it.

My point is they could have worded it better and it might have gotten a response. If you ask kindly about the BLOBs and maybe for some help to push you in the right direction instead of saying "I don't know", then it is fair to call the maintainer rude for ignoring it completely.

76
890

Incase it doesn't show up:

19
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I'm developing a program in C++ targeting flatpak, since I'm on an immutable system I'd rather develop for flatpak than try using a container (plus I can't get SDL to open a window in a container anyway). Everything works with GNOME Builder but it's not as nice to use as vscode: less syntax highlighting, doesn't reopen where I left off, can't debug multiple instances (Not to say I don't like GNOME Builder - it's really good and will only get better, it's just slowing me down at this point). I managed to get the flatpak building and debugging from within code, using the vscode-flatpak extension the only thing not working properly is clangd. I am using the meson build system.

This is probably a bit of a long shot, but has anyone else tried to do this?

BTW I'm not talking about using clangd with the vscode flatpak package

38
-63
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Personally I believe this is a very poor take

818
405
291

I personally love Naev and Mindustry

264

Just came across this gem. The creator also did a write-up if you wanted to replicate it yourself: https://kittenlabs.de/real-gaming-router/

91
19

I've seen it covered widely for Windows, but I don't know if people have gotten it working on Linux.

I've been thinking about buying an nVidia Tesla p40 off of eBay for a GPU upgrade. Currently I'm running a Quadro M2000 in my Dell Precision T7910 with dual Xeon E5-2620 v3 processors. Obviously, I'll have to work out how to cool it but apparently people have had success with GTX 1080 coolers for dead graphics cards.

I'll need to keep the Quadro for video output since the Xeons have no integrated graphics. I'm hoping it would behave like an Optimus laptop, so I don't have flickering in Xwayland (in preparation for Fedora 40, plus I prefer Wayland anyway).

If anyone has attempted this maybe with another Tesla card I'd like to know how it went.

34
view more: next ›

unionagainstdhmo

joined 1 year ago