227
Smart devices are turning out to be a poor investment
(www.androidpolice.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
227 points (92.2% liked)
Technology
58063 readers
3468 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This person prioritized buying the new hotness over researching longevity, and they got burned.
Amazon and Google's products are not where I would invest my money if I was concerned about long term support. Both of those companies have a solid track record of killing stuff off.
Buy that stuff if you want, but don't be surprised if something gets killed off in 3-5 years.
The problem is that non-smart stuff (or at least stuff that doesn't require a cloud connection) is hard to come by. For example:
And so on. It's increasingly difficult to find decent, long lasting stuff. Almost everything is going to be incredibly insecure in 3-5 years once software support stops, and then it'll be irresponsible to keep it any longer.
At this point, I don't think you can really blame the consumers, manufacturers seem intent on driving this "smart home" nonsense. Sure, have a tier for that product, but also sell a version without it.
The cost of the parts necessary for the network connectivity is nothing in comparison to the money all that data brings. That's probably why it's happening everywhere.
Also planned obsolescence.
Or if the smart device circuit board breaks, charge so much for replacement parts that the customer just buys a new device.
One more thing. TVs
You might want to consider buying a smart TV and simply not connecting it to WiFi. That’s what I did.
If you buy a TV with CEC support, it will effectively be a dumb monitor that feels like a 1 remote smart system.
That's a workaround, but IMO it has issues:
What I really want is a massive monitor, but apparently I can't have that...
The signal is arguably sales vs activations.
And as for ads, I have a new Samsung QLED connected to CEC devices. I literally never see the TV’s UI. It feels like a computer monitor. CEC bypasses all the input selectors and UI that they would normally use to prompt stuff. It’s worth checking out. CEC is kind of rad and give the end user back a lot of control.
Commercial displays are also another choice if you don’t want smart crap. Although, those dumb displays can actually cost more because the manufacturer isn’t able to monetize the TV with apps and ads.
The smart features help keep the cost down. I’m absolutely that you should never connect a smart TV to the internet. I learned that the hard way when a config change on my router slowed the UI on my Samsung TV to a crawl. Unplugging the Ethernet fixed it. Afterwards I switched to Apple TV and have been overall happy since.
Thoughts on fridges and lights.
Fisher Paykel has a lot of options for french door fridges with ice in the freezer.
And for automated lights that can be independent of the cloud, you might want to look at switches instead. There are lots of options there that can run offline. I like Lutron’s stuff, which has pretty solid cloud service support, but can still run timers and automations offline.