1197
submitted 6 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Otakulad@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Fine, I accept that, but what exactly did I say that caused the post to be removed? All I said was he was probably a paid posted. How is that not being civil?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

You can see your modlog here:

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&userId=1641922

"This poster is a paid Russian sympathizer. Baby account, bad English, and only posted in posts regarding this topic."

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). **It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members.**Engage in good-faith and with respect!

Attacking other users, which you did three times in one comment, is not allowed.

[-] Otakulad@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah, no. Your interpretation is incorrect in my opinion.

Yes, it was a baby account. Only 6 hours old. The icon next to their name is a baby. How can you punish me for something the site does as well?

Also, the English the person used did not sound like it was English as a first language.

Lastly, let's take a look at your verbiage.

Perjorative: expressing contempt or disapproval

Calling a person a paid Russian sympathizer does not meet this definition. He was acting as if Russia is the victim in this story. I was saying what he was.

I would appreciate if when reports are made, they are actually looked at and not blindly removed.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -2 points 6 months ago

calling another user a paid russian sympathizer is obviously pejorative.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

This ^ I didn't really need to look farther than that.

[-] Otakulad@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

No, it's not. Calling out what someone is does not meet the definition. Additionally, you said I did three things in my comment, most of which were false.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Unless you have positive proof that someone is a paid Russian shill, yes, that IS a personal attack and will be removed.

The rule is simple: You do not attack other users. Full stop. You can disagree with their ideas, but the minute you throw down unfounded accusations, that's a different deal.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
1197 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2503 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS