26
submitted 1 year ago by Beni@feddit.de to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Bitbucket also doesn't enforce these rules properly. You can simply change the rules, merge, then change back.

The only way around that is to restrict every developer account into oblivion and only have an ops guy as repo admin, but I think most ops teams have better things to do.

[-] DrM@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Why should a developer be a Repo admin? Thats DevOps territory

[-] tr00st@lemmy.tr00st.co.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Aah, DevOps as a separate role... Now that's a dream I can get behind...

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

That very much depends on your workflow and team setup. Repo admin for me means "can alter who and how branches can be merged". That's usually a job for lead devs.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
26 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32050 readers
1612 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS