150
submitted 9 months ago by Goronmon@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] addie@feddit.uk 75 points 9 months ago

Which makes perfect sense - none of the previous producers have. Mostly, they've just used their stock characters and locations, and made a game that they thought would be fun out of them. There's a couple of games that qualify as 'direct sequels' (Ocarina -> Majora's, Wind Waker -> Hourglass) but even then, it doesn't benefit you much to have played the preceding one. Would be weird to try and twist the games into a chronology that strikes me mostly as 'fanon' anyway.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 9 months ago

Nintendo did try that, though, and mixed it around again whenever they felt like it. "New research uncovered that..." blah blah. Better off if they don't bother anymore.

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
150 points (93.6% liked)

Games

31816 readers
1331 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS