52
submitted 11 months ago by wiki_me@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

hasn't red hat always been proprietary whereas fedora was community driven?

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Everything is still FOSS.

HOWEVER, they are no longer dumping the 1:1 RHEL source code. So the changes to RHEL will still be available, but freeloading for-profit projects will have to locate and integrate the packages separately and at their own time and expense i.e Alma, Scientific, etc.

Basically certain companies would sell their cheaper RHEL clones on the promise that they were "bug for bug compatible" with RHEL, but cost a lot less overall, because they weren't shouldering any development costs.

[-] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 months ago

Exactly. To add on to this, there were companies deploying clones and then buying a RHEL license to get access to support for all of it. These are the same kinds of people who run their businesses on pirated software. We should have zero sympathy for them.

Projects like Rocky and Alma may have been valuable for developers and small projects, but they were also enabling freeloaders. Looking at this whole thing objectively, it is clear that Red Hat is targeting the freeloaders who run their business on CentOS and are scamming support. That is evident in the fact that they are giving away free licenses for small projects.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
52 points (91.9% liked)

Open Source

30764 readers
569 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS