679
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Why? Isn't this just capitalism? They're just using algorithms to squeeze us further.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 20 points 10 months ago

Well, as you've likely noticed, capitalism only works a theoretical construct. It makes the assumption of an 'ideal' market, which very much violates the laws of physics. As a result, no country actually employs unregulated capitalism.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Adam Smith wanted regulated capitalism.

Free market capitalism was never his idea. That's robber barons like Jeff that promoted that shit and came up with the idea.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

i don’t think it works even in a theoretical context. like you said, it requires assumptions that violate the laws of physics. i don’t think that’s a great starting place for any political/economic system.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

Well, I did write construct, not context. So, yeah, I do mean that you need to make up a fundamentally different reality (where everything happens in a singularity) for it to then potentially work as the theories say.

And while we can have arguments on whether those theories with fundamentally wrong axioms can still be mapped to reality, monopolization is a very obvious example where it falls apart and we do need regulation from the outside.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

oh i misread that the first time. yeah i completely agree. i was even thinking of saying the thing about monopolies in my comment, i think it’s a pretty good example of how things start to fall apart.

making up fundamentally different realities does sound like fun though, just not for the purposes of trying to justify capitalism.

[-] Mahlzeit@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Depends on your definition of "capitalism".

This is not supposed to happen in a market economy, as you have in developed countries. Many people define "capitalism" as being, more or less, that system.

A narrower definition of "capitalism" is private control of the means of production. In that sense, "capitalism" is at odds with a market economy, which is one reason why that private control is limited in many ways in developed countries.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

That’s literally the argument Amazon is making. They have said the Nessie tool is just for market analysis and doesn’t do 90% of what it’s are accused of doing 🙄

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Sadly this is exactly what capitalism is though, and the government allows them to do worse

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago

These companies own 80% of them. The other 20% are already bought by someone else.

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
679 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58157 readers
3662 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS