479
submitted 11 months ago by snek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Hamas’ brutal attacks in Israel on October 7 killed at least 1,400 people and the group took more than 200 hostages, according to Israeli authorities. In the wake of the assault, Israel launched an aerial bombardment of Gaza that Palestinian health officials say has killed more than 5,000 people. Israel also announced a “complete siege” on the enclave, withholding vital supplies of water, food and fuel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] probablyaCat@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

How are you ignoring the fact that Hamas takes the fuel. The UN just said they had their fuel stolen. So those babies will die, more Israelis will die, and more Palestinians will die.

If the UN had forces guarding supplies and stopping theft, that might be different. But you are asking Israel to allow in supplies that are be and will continue to be stolen and used in attacks against Israel. Ignoring that it will not save civilians.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

So why doesn't Israel distribute fuel to civilian Palestinians in Gaza?

[-] probablyaCat@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

Because they'd be attacked, kidnapped, and/or killed. Seriously what kind of question is this? How do you propose they go into Gaza, distribute the aid, and not get attacked. Hamas is rolling right up to the aid and stealing it. Are you suggesting Israel completely occupy the region and maintain security in order to distribute aid?

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 9 points 11 months ago

Because their government, Hamas, is in charge of that. The logistics to distribute fuel would require reoccupation of the Gaza Strip.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

Ah yes for Israel to give humanitarian aid it has to commit 2-3 more war crimes.

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest -4 points 11 months ago

I feel like we're missing the part where Israel could just turn the power back on... if Hamas has fuel to run their weapons what is even the point of cutting electricity?

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 4 points 11 months ago

Generally, as a competent government, you don't attack and call for the genocide of your neighbors; starting a war. And then expect that neighbor to fund your war effort.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Here we have someone trying to say that withholding food and medicine and fuel for 2.2m people, half of which are children, is the same as not funding your enemy's war efforts.

Fuck me sideways.

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 0 points 10 months ago

Turns out food, fuel and medicine are considered dual purpose goods. They have civilian purposes and they have military applications. When you declare a war against your neighbor; you shouldn't expect that neighbor to fund, at it's own expense, your economy.

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 4 points 11 months ago

Hamas steals fuel supplies from the UN in Gaza. So supplying the UNWRA fuel is going to give Hamas more fuel.

If the UN want a humanitarian aid they need to send blue hats entitled to protect the aid like they do in Africa.

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest 0 points 11 months ago

I think you're missing my point.

Do you think the entire power grid of Gaza is run off fossil fuel generators inside of Gaza?

I'll just cut to the chase. Here, have an infographic from the UN that might be slightly out of date but will still give you a much better understanding of the situation

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 5 points 11 months ago

I'm aware that Israel provides massive amounts of monetary and in kind aid to Palestinians both in the West Bank and the Gaza strip.

I'm questioning why Hamas, as the defacto government of the Gaza Strip, expects that aid to continue to flow after declaring war? That's stupid. The phrase is, "Don't bite the hand that feeds you."

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest -2 points 11 months ago
[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

It's not a war crime to decline to arm your enemy.

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest 0 points 11 months ago

Yes collective punishment is a war crime

Now please stop bothering me with these low effort comments

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 0 points 10 months ago

Did you read that document? It's banning things like reprisals (the act of killing random civilians as a response for military members being killed). Nowhere in there does it demand you supply the civilians of the government your at war with in the territory that government controls.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

I'm sorry is this really your whole argument for why Israel should be allowed to do war crimes?

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
479 points (93.6% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2620 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS