569
submitted 11 months ago by Stamets@startrek.website to c/funny@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 11 months ago

The fact that that translates to animals means that (non human) animals deserve to be considered in human morals.

no, it doesn't. why should it?

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

Ok then, WHY IS torturing animals for fun bad then? Keep in mind we have a psychological condition for people who do, so at least the medical field thinks its wrong

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago

kant would say you shouldn't (i think his example was kicking dogs), because it is cruel, and practicing cruelty may condition you so that you end up being cruel to a person, and that would be wrong.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
569 points (89.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5393 readers
1708 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS