44
submitted 11 months ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jack@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago
[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

That wouldn't explain such a big gap between American media and everyone else, but it would explain why some journalists might have gotten it wrong. Either way, it's extremely lazy and negligent to just copy Reuters without looking for a primary source, especially when that primary source is literally a massive public figure.

[-] burningmatches@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

Reuters is a news wire — ie, newspapers pay to “copy” its stories. It’s not lazy. It’s why Reuters exists.

[-] CordanWraith@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

That seems kinda inefficient though. Why do the newspapers exist and we don't just get our news from Reuters directly? I mean, other than the obvious competency issue, but as shown that applied to the newspapers too.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sure, I'll accept that, but it indicates a complete lack of editorial control and that journalists are being assigned articles they know absolutely nothing about.

Landing on the pole is extremely challenging and, from what I know of their space program, outside of India's current capabilities. That fact should have been caught far before publication, but of the US news sources I could find only AP and NPR caught it.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
44 points (90.7% liked)

World News

32075 readers
974 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS