Which would also be worse than the events being unrelated. In the simplest case it'd be guilt-tripping ( you owe me!) or at worst some sort of odd blackmail.

[...]Plants vs. Zombies Jordan Adams, and Director Partnerships at EAX Matthew Angeleri.

Adams would also send female coworkers pornographic videos and even reference them in EA Slack conversations

While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.

Why the article can't just state what the allegations are and at whom is just annoying, so here you go.

What confuses me a bit is the sentence just before the allegations to Angeleri:

As for Matthew Angeleri, he invited his female coworkers to stay at his home with his wife while visiting Vegas where they were given free room and lodging. While that seemed like an act of goodwill, Angeleri privately sexually harassed said female coworkers and even followed it up with videos of himself having lewd acts performed on himself.

Like... What? What is the logical connection between these two sentences? There could be months or years between those two events? How do these two relate? This reads as two completely separate events. So one could just be an act of goodwill and afterwards he decided to be a prick. Or, first the was a prick and then felt bad and offered the coworker a place to stay?

And if the two events were concurrent that makes it immensely more creepy.

This seems to be posted on this forum with that title solely for rage-bait.

She clearly just-for-fun redesigned Wikipedia as if a modern company got a hold of it. Yes of course this would drive people in this forum up a wall, but that's just not the point. This is also not about programming at all?

Don't go around looking for content of other creators just to take it out of context and then bash it.

This is like you watched "we made marvel r-rated" from corridor digital (https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=k5-3eujJyZE) and then post about it, being pissed how they destroyed a superhero fantasy aimed at a wide audience and children and how noone would ever want something like that.

Calling her a bad designer just because you disagree with her design decisions is just mean. This entire post just makes it seem like you are specifically looking for things to hate...

I think you accidently made a meme that is just too close to the truth to be seen as sarcastic

Anyone who thinks this is just incapable of navigating them.

A lemmy user made a comment on a similar post 'press statements about future stock prices are kinda self fulfilling prophecies'

Which, if you think about it, benefits those holding shares/interested in the stock... For example: a former boss of an oil company talking about how the price might hike ...

0.0 run the fuck away!

God damn, those look like police/first response, why are they this close to it?!

Have you heard of e os? https://e.foundation/e-os/

De googling your android is at least a possibility, ripping apple out of ios is not possible

/u/Chainweasel@lemmy.world explains this well, though I got a different take on the analogy.

Imagine you are trying to put air into a deflating balloon that's about to 'loose form' that's essentially what you are trying.

Put just enough air (energy/mass) into the star and it will stay stable, loosing as much as you put into it.

Too little and the star will dissolved, in this example you'd fully absorb it.

Too much and you are essentially infusing a star with so much mass that it explodes all over again.

If you are trying to stabilise a star this way, ideally, it would never even begin to go nova.

OK I am dumb I didn't read the edit at the end

I mean... Maybe I am just oversimplifying things or misreading something, but if the cabinet the switch was on was metal then maybe the switch connected ground to ground? Suddenly changing ground to ground can crash old hardware quite reliably but booting with another ground plate could make it adjust the potentials properly... I've done this multiple times in a lab, in essence adding more ground causes the ground plates to equal out and that sudden drop can crash sensitive hardware...

Please tell me i am wrong I want this magic switch to be true so bad

Here is a documentation link of chromiums conceptual application layer: https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/displaying-a-web-page-in-chrome/ which clearly shows the core of chromium (especially rendering, and API infrastructure by w3) is done via WebKit through a Webkit Port and a glue layer for type compatability.

I never said WebKit and Chromium are the same engine, mainly because chromium is not an engine at all. WebKit is a browser engine and is the core of chromium, chromium is a browser core, but not an engine.

Where do you get the information from that most fingerprinting is done in JS ? Because, in the end, the data has to be sent to a server to be processed (even if the fingerprint is aggregated in a cookie). Which in turn would just be another way of saying its on the backend.

If i do a JS request to the backend bc i want to see album X and its cover, i request the resource from the server. There is no way around this. If the actions I took are saved on a local cookie or the server directly logs the request makes 0 difference in the end as to process the logged action it would've to be sent to the server anyways; else there is no point in logging.

Here is mozillas docs for fingerprinting: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Fingerprinting As can be seen the tab itself only has access to the APIs of the hardware down under, which can in turn not really be trusted as any linux user can easily spoof these. Sure you can be identified, as in your browser. But nothing about your hardware. I just did that test and all the hardware info is miles off.

I am not sure what point you are trying to make.