sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Thirded. TrueCharts has been a monumental pita. Looking forward to docker compose in the fall with the next version of TrueNAS is released.

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I'll not have you bad mouth poutine, friend. It's a national treasure and deserves respect.

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you haven't run Doom on it, are you really even trying?

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Ah, fantastic! Thank you!

10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by windlas@lemmy.ca to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world

In the context menu on a given post, would it be possible to add an option to block that community (or user) directly?

As it stands now, I'd have to go to that community and then block it from there, unless I'm missing something.

Edit: Disregard. It's already in the software. Long press on the community name let's you block.

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Better blocklists? They're working fine for me.

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Use a p2p block list in your torrent client. Once I started using that the emails stopped.

I use: https://github.com/Naunter/BT_BlockLists/

But there are probably others

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 months ago

Very interesting, thanks for sharing. I didnt realise that Arch adoption was so high. I (don't) use arch, BTW. Although now I feel like I want to give it a spin to see what all the fuss is about!

Or maybe I'll stay fat, dumb, and happy with Fedora and Nobara on my desktop and laptop.

Not that it would change anything for me personally, but I really think Pop! OS is a poor naming choice. Who puts an exclamation mark in their name? Aside from Yahoo! I suppose.

12
Protectli FW6B (lemmy.ca)
submitted 8 months ago by windlas@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I'm using a Protectli FW6B as my opnsense firewall/router. I'm upgrading my internet service to 1.5 GB fiber and I'm not sure what to do with this device once I do. I could continue using it as my router (I guess put it on the LAN side of the supplied Bell "Gigahub" router/WiFi ap/whatever the fiber equivalent of a modem is?) but then I lose out on 1/3 of my bandwidth.

I already have a homebuilt NAS running truenas with a bunch of services - I guess I could move all those services from truenas onto the Protectli and keep the NAS solely as a storage system?

Either that or just sell it to recupe the costs somewhat. I'm already considering selling my ruckus 510s because the new router comes with WiFi 6. If I did that, I'd probably look to sell the 2x ruckus r510 aps I have setup too.

Is there another option I'm missing?

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Thirded. Once it was setup, it just runs and does its thing in the background.

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Dozens + 1, friend!

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Bayonet Neill–Concelman?

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Welcome! One of us, one of us, one of us!

[-] windlas@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

That's cold...

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by windlas@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I see a lot of posts about Redhat for putting their code base behind a paywall. I've only been using Linux as my main desktop OS for a couple of years now. Someone recommended Fedora at the time, and I've been happy with it. I had previously tried PopOS, Mint, and Ubuntu, but none of them convinced me to switch from Windows full time until I tried again with Fedora.

How will what Redhat is doing affect Fedora for the home user? Should I start considering something else?

Edit: thanks for all of the responses! Sticking with fedora for now it is.

view more: next ›

windlas

joined 1 year ago