I don’t really understand the argument of “people will use what ships.”

Because that's just how things are. Why do you think Google pays billions yearly to be the default search engine wherever they can?

Most of the points listed here don't matter a hoot to the average user.

I agree with you there. It's a known issue, the workaround is to load into comments.

Loads perfectly fine for me. FYI, you have to view the comments for the full image to load. If you click on it from the main feed, you'll get the blurry low res version you posted.

Yeah I used to enjoy them. But they've been really shit recently

Can you link to the post in question?

Thank you for bringing some sanity to the discussion

They're a Filipino. Not exactly an infamous source of antisemitists. And '88' may mean something in the west, but here in Asia it generally means nothing more than your birth year.

Are we now accusing others of antisemitism based on nothing more than a few random letters? WTF?

Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.

Not sure why you're citing US law when we're discussing foreign govts. Also the obvious thing signal can do, that most complainants would probably expect as a minimum, is banning their accounts and closing the group.

I don't get what you're trying to say at all. If a party is in a group chat and reports it, they can provide their credentials to Signal to enable Signal to view the contents of the chat.

Yes, they're a carrier that does not know the content of what they carry. But once they are made aware, the legal system considers them to now bear responsibility if they don't take action. Whether or not that's fair is a pretty large topic, though I'm inclined to think so myself.