sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah right, and they are a big problem. I haven’t encountered a single V1 super charger in Europe after 4 years.

I have only ever seen one in the US and it was surrounded by V2 and V3.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You will not have that problem with Tesla though. All chargers are 150kW+.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Tesla super chargers are €0,36 per kWh

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Just to add: they should not be chained, but they should run in parallel.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The car indeed has mobile data. A Tesla has a permanent 4g connection.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Huh?! If I look at the source of the article at Mozilla, Tesla is actually ranked as almost least creepy.

So I do not understand where this is coming from. Also the picture of the article only showing teslas is highly suggestive

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/cars/

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can configure nextjs to compile as only client-side-rendering, so that it runs like before!

Another thing: NextJS is not only SSR. It’s hybrid. The advantage here is that it decreases the visible first load time.

First load pre-rendered HTML and styling is sent to the browser. So the page is already fully visible. After that all scripts and secondary CSS will be loaded. And even after that the bindings will be done.

Where as with pure CSR, all JavaScripts need to be loaded and executed and only then stuff will become visible to the user

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hmm you’re right about autopilot mainly being used on highways and those roads are a lot safer. I’ll edit my main comment

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Just wow.

I bet you do not live in The Netherlands. We have a standardized process to complain against a fine.

If the picture doesn’t prove with certainty that you were holding a phone, complain to the address in the letter or just don’t pay the €359 fine and talk to a judge about it.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The fine contains a letter, a picture and payment information. If the person really wasn’t using their phone, they can file a complaint and the fine will be dismissed. Seems pretty simple to me.

However, I have not heard any complaints about it in the news and an embarrassing amount of fines has been given for this offense.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You’re totally right.

There is a manual door handle, which is not supposed to be used.

Most guests in my car naturally tend to go for the manual handle instead of the button, when not instructed.

So the people who claim to be locked are either looking for money or are total dumbfucks.

view more: next ›

tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq

joined 1 year ago