sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] testman@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago

this is what open source dialer app died for?

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Other comments already pointed to some very good software solutions.
But I would argue that absolutely the biggest barrier to entry for the masses is hardware.
Restoring an old PC or making some cable spaghetti with some SBC is currently too advanced for average person.
Self-hosting for the masses would require some new form of home servers.
Something modular, where adding new components would be as easy as playing with Lego bricks.

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago

OH REALLY?

heh, good one

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago

I appreciate everyone in this thread giving actually useful replies instead of pointing out that OP could have posted in a more suitable community.

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Does Organic Maps support it?

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

I don't think there are any VR games on F-Droid.
From what I see, there are even barely any games of any kind on F-Droid.

50
submitted 7 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/android@lemdro.id
[-] testman@lemmy.ml 31 points 7 months ago

Is this the "agile" development methodology that I heard so much about?

70
submitted 7 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
[-] testman@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Problem is that the whole concept of advertising is "telling other people what to do".

  • People use Google.
  • Google tells people to use Chrome
  • Chrome becomes most popular browser
  • Chrome removes the " this site has RSS" icon from URL bar
  • People forget that RSS is a thing
  • People now rely on Google News and other biased sites to get information
  • biased sites tell people what to do

RSS is freedom
go tell other people to use it
also Lemmy RSS community

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Your post is missing the most important information that you wanted to share

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago

sup dawg, heard you like advertisments

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago
43
submitted 7 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/fdroid@lemmy.ml
[-] testman@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Something like Cryptpad Form?
https://cryptpad.fr/

17
submitted 8 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
43
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by testman@lemmy.ml to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml
19
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by testman@lemmy.ml to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml
-18
submitted 9 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
5
submitted 11 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/5768010

You know BOINC, the thing where you can donate your processing power to specific computational projects?
Is there anything like that, but for hosting platforms / services?
Something where you could say "I am willing to dedicate this much of my CPU, RAM and storage space to this project or this group of people".
Say that I have a server that is more or less collecting dust, and I want to make it do something productive.
I am aware of YUNOHost and alternatives, but that still requires me to choose which things to deploy and also somehow then offer that to the community.
As a certified lazy dude, I would much rather say "here's the computer, use it for whatever you need the most".
The issue I see with this is that my goodwill could be abused for hosting something inappropriate or even illegal, and then I would be held responsible. So there should be some transparency requirement or some other mechanism that helps prevents this.

And yes, self-hosting would not be the accurate term to describe this kind of distributed resource sharing. "croud-sourced self-hosting"? "crowd-hosting" sounds like a good description for this phenomenon.
Some implementation of this probably already exists. Please provide any relevant names or links that would help me find more about this.

73
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by testman@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

If top of the society is immoral psychopaths with power, and most of the society is composed of people with good intentions, then there is not much hope for "beta uprising" until things go way beyond point of recovery, because powerful psychopaths will not let their power get taken away.

Not sure if this is just evolutionary biology, but this cycle of psychopaths at the top has been going on since when, at least ancient Egypt. And in all these thousands of years, the system that enables this cycle got way more reinforced than it got dismantled.

So is it maybe better idea to put benevolent people's energy towards designing and preparing a new societal system that will have built-in mechanisms for preventing corruption and malevolence? "prepare" as in get ready to implement for when the current messed up system is about to grind to a halt and collapse? Well, it would be best to figure out how to go full Benevolent Theseus™ by replacing parts of currently failing system with the corruption-proof ones.

What are some resources related to this topic? Recearch on societal dynamics, designing political systems, examples of similar revolutions that already happened, etc. Post any links that you consider relevant

52
submitted 11 months ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
45
submitted 1 year ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

You know how cursor behaves in practically any text field / text area / command line, where arrow keys move cursor by single character, but holding down Ctrl while pressing arrow keys moves cursor by whole word.

What kind of wizardry would one do in order to switch this around?
As in, make the move-by-word the default behaviour, but make holding down Ctrl move cursor by just a single character? Some keyboard input binding, where ⬅ is an alias for Ctrl+⬅ ? But no idea how to make the opposite of this. Make Ctrl+⬅ an keyboard shortcut for xdotool key Left or something?
Does a setting like this already exist?

Also not sure if /c/linux is the most appropriate community for this question. Feel free to suggest more appropriate one or even cross-post to there.
Thank you

24
submitted 1 year ago by testman@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

The whole idea is a privacy minefield, so it would have to be very carefully designed and implemented, of course making it opt-in. But still, should we even pursue this idea?

So that, for example, even if I met someone just briefly, they can still later see the contact information that I am willing to provide.

Wouldn't that make it much easier to connect with people who live close to you?

Are there any relevant projects or ideas that already exist?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

testman

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF