Nuclear's problem is that, when an issue happens, it is so very visible.

The millions of people dying every year to air pollution are far more spread out, so who cares?

You're more likely to crash in a car, yet people are (generally) far more scared of planes.

If it does then I wonder how a free tool could do it.

And if you do, indeed, need to pay for the car's cellular then I hope features such as these are included.

I can understand the remote start from the app being a paid thing for sure.

But why would it need to be? The connectivity from the app is there already, it takes the manufacturer very little to handle the occasional web request. Especially if it can be done for free through third party software.

You mean the underage "dating" servers?

I like how GNOME looks, I've messed around with it a little on my laptop.

I really ought to switch my main pc to Linux.

That's cool and all but I won't trust Microsoft with anything anymore. I've really liked Halo in the past, but I won't be buying anything they put out.

but this seems outside her experience.

When has that ever stopped people from saying shit.

this can't be an accurate or reasonably accurate depiction, these are two completely different storms in a different category after all.

What do you mean? This shows the differences between the two.

But you just said

Mozilla could have focused on being user-supported through fundraising like Wikipedia.

It is an option.

Clearly it isn't working well enough for them.

It's a long one, but Climate Town did a great video on this.

You can donate to Mozilla.

Perhaps they should've put that more front and center. But if they add a prominent donate button the people on here would probably lose their shit too.