sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Second! I love my brother

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

I’d say Nix as well!

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

I think he has, but if you’re hankering for more Bryan Cantril then you should listen to the “On The Metal” podcast. It’s fantastic

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 months ago

Microsoft doesn’t make their money selling to consumers, they make their money selling to businesses. Thats why you don’t really need a Windows license, and why the OS is filled to the brim with garbage

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 months ago

I think we found one…

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago

If it’s not exactly novel, how many comments do you really need?

An LLM is just gonna describe the code it sees. Good comments should include information and context that is not already in the source.

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago

Useful comments should provide context or information not already available in the code. There is no LLM that can generate good comments from the source alone

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

This is seriously what’s missing from the software field. There is no rigor or responsibility

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

A build tool like bazel would be able to “hide” the generated code. Essentially you never see it in the repo because it’s generated on the fly and cached

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I have the same problem as OP, and this is how exactly how I cope! If the details are irrelevant, than you don’t need to keep them in short term memory

[-] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

Its concurrency model is the biggest standout for me. Anything taking inspiration from Pony is worth a look

view more: ‹ prev next ›

superb

joined 1 year ago