sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago

I'm not sure you understand what "objectively" actually means... Care to provide your data in support of your objective conclusion?

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 3 points 8 months ago

Ran into a similar conundrum. We use mealie for recipe management and occasionally meal planning, but the shopping list is clunky. We resorted to just making a list on a card in Planks. Not purpose-built, but it has worked rather well for us.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 8 points 8 months ago

I don't know how you got a picture of me, but I demand it is removed!

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Potentially, but precision is important, especially if you're going to make sweeping claims about a topic, acting as an authority.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 7 points 8 months ago

This is absolutely not what DNSSEC is. DNSSEC provides authenticity of the response, not privacy. You're describing a means of encrypted name resolution, like dns-over-tls, dns-over-https, etc.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 6 points 8 months ago

I haven't done a code review so I can't answer that question with facts. I do think however, that anything that bootstraps a FLOSS framework like openwrt could easily be a risk to privacy.

You use privacy and security interchangeably here. They are not the same.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 16 points 8 months ago

If you have any question on truth worthiness, you can flash stock openwrt on them. You just lose out on their proprietary webUI and pre installed plugins. I believe their firmware is public on GitHub though.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah, put that trash in prison!

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 13 points 10 months ago

That all sounds correct to me. The random port you're seeing in the logs is a high port, often referred to as an ephemeral port, and it is common for source ports. All good there.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 8 points 10 months ago

Agreed. SMD components fail silently.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 34 points 10 months ago

This is pedantic, but there are indeed capacitors there. They're all surface mount components, so they don't look like the caps that people typically talk about replacing, and they likely aren't what caused it to fail. Anything labeled on the board with a C## is likely a SMD capacitor.

[-] starkzarn@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

His teeth caught my eye first. Smile and count how many teeth you can see. Now double that and this guy's still got you beat.

view more: next ›

starkzarn

joined 1 year ago