sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Is it? James Harden must find a way to play for the Blazers.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

And probably downloaded from random sketchy website ad.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's also that they put out a product I actually find value from like Linux support, Steam Input, forums, workshop, etc. I enjoy using Steam because I find it to be a good experience.

It's like reasons people prefer Android or Apple even if they share the same apps. Really can't discount the experience simple things like navigation and social features do to add value. Those who dismiss it as unimportant probably share the same views as some MBA who only looks at the numbers and think they can just enter and corner a market through brute force spending.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

In a way it like trying to enter the smartphone market and paying for app exclusives then ignoring the part about polishing the OS experience as much as possible and putting out something that is from the flip phone era.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

Epic store not being profitable and despite the backing of Fortnite and Unreal Engine surplas being at the state that it is shows that it is probably much more expensive than expected to make a feature rich launcher. What epic has is more a glorified storefront like humble bundle or Fanatical but worse because it isn't even selling keys for the platform of your choice, and they have to handle server costs of storing all the games too.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

There's Marvel Rivals which is going to be f2p and is another hero shooter too. So just bad timing and executive decisions overall.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Sorry I don't remember usernames. All these comments just got mixed up with the rest playing up that angle.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

You still haven't given a reason why to actually use epic despite your attempts to paint a billion dollar company as though it is some altruistic startup. If product isn't good why should I go out of my way to pay for a worse one from another billionaire. If it is all billionaires I'm going to just pick the better product.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe idea as a concept popped up 8 years ago but actual development didn't start until years later.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

As budgets have increased to crazy abouts it has felt like tv shows have become stretched out movies that would have been better off as movies. It's made even worse by how more TV shows despite production values being high have felt like filler and then have a two year long gap on top of it.

Miniseries are ones that haven't felt that way for me lately.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I know how capitalism works... I was just sharing my thoughts on the situation of a company knowingly adjusting the algorithm in a positive direction for one demographic but a negative for another showing a clear awareness of impact. Not sure why you are so worked up about tiktok getting criticized too. Whatever.

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Uhhh... I don't think you got my point for why I also included Facebook and Twitter at the end as examples of domestic companies also willingly allowing harmful societal trends.

Money being a reason doesn't absolve and provide a convient out and let companies do whatever they want without consequence or criticism. I put them all in the camp of willingly selling out a worse society for profit, and whether a country sees that as a win for them or not doesn't change that.

view more: next ›

stardust

joined 11 months ago