sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, never thought about this before, but how do blind users deal with captchas?

83

Not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on mastodon @selfhst@fosstodon.org

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Have you used fish? The built-in fuzzy matching works pretty well for me. Wondering if there's any reason to add atuin in. Sync seems like a negative to me more than a positive.

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Rust is a lot more niche and intimidating of a language compared to Swift. Swift is familiar to C++ devs, while modernizing the language and toolchain, and providing safety guarantees.

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Also, Safari on Windows had low usage, and was probably a pain to maintain. Swift cross platform is more about abstracting out Apple specific things (like the standard library and UI toolkit). Apple has already been investing multi-year efforts into Swift on the server for longer than Safari on Windows existed. The last couple versions of Swift (~3-4years of development) have been almost entirely focused on safe concurrency, which is intended for server-side development.

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago

Actually, this isn't true. Apple has a vested interest in cross platform Swift. They've been pushing hard for Swift on Linux because they want Swift to run on servers, and they're right to. Look at how hard JavaScript dominates on the server-side because of one language everywhere.

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I've worked with Swift a bunch for Apple platforms, am mildly familiar with how it works on other platforms. It should be able to compile on a wide host of platforms with minimal/no issues. The runtime dependencies are localized to Apple platforms, and I think the dominant UI toolkit on other platforms is a Swift port of qt. So it should be just fine?

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

What do you have against the number 4?

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

That's what decentraleyes does as well

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

This is a fantastic write-up, thanks for sharing!

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

What's wrong with Business Insider? Genuine question

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

You declare it in the package.json as a category when publishing. It's completely self-selected with no oversight, review, or enforced permissions.

[-] savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 months ago

I believe they're referring to lower down in the article, where the researchers analyzed existing extensions on the marketplace:

After the successful experiment, the researchers decided to dive into the threat landscape of the VSCode Marketplace, using a custom tool they developed named 'ExtensionTotal' to find high-risk extensions, unpack them, and scrutinize suspicious code snippets.

Through this process, they have found the following:

  • 1,283 with known malicious code (229 million installs).
  • 8,161 communicating with hardcoded IP addresses.
  • 1,452 running unknown executables.
  • 2,304 that are using another publisher's Github repo, indicating they are a copycat.
74

It's been a little bit, but I'm back! As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @selfhst@fosstodon.org

46

Not my newsletter, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @selfhst@fosstodon.org

186

Not my website. Interested to see how this will play out though!

6

As a long time follower, this is pretty exciting! I've definitely been looking for something along these lines.

63

As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @selfhst@fosstodon.org

64
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

The weekly post. As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @selfhst@fosstodon.org.

83

Weekly share. As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at selfhst@fosstodon.org.

81

Weekly posting! As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at selfhst@fosstodon.org.

55

My weekly post :) usual reminder: not my blog, just a good community share! Writers are on Mastodon at selfhst@fosstodon.org.

79

Not my blog, just a good community share :)

29
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by savedbythezsh@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I heard about this project years ago. Cool concept: standardized, interchangeable storage + identity that can be plugged into arbitrary apps. The idea is that your identity is tied to your data, and your data can be hosted anywhere so you can retain control over your data or use a simple provider. It was also created by Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the web.

However, it doesn't seem to be gaining traction anywhere, even in the already-niche self-hosting community. From the GitHub (which was hard to find on the website!) I could see that it's being actively developed, including a new website redesign, but everything else seems stagnant. Their newsletter has no updates since 2021. There are only a small handful of apps listed on the site and most of them haven't been maintained since 2019 or earlier, and a lot are just things like "solid pod explorer" or "demo app".

Anyone had any experience with it? Or know more about the situation? I would love to see this become more widely used.

view more: next ›

savedbythezsh

joined 1 year ago