I wasn't pointing out that you did anything. I understand you only provided translation. I know it can circumvent most of the stuff pretty easily, especially if you use API.

Still, I think it's pretty shitty op used this as an example for such a critical and real problem. This only weakens the narrative

Can a parrot lie? I didn't know that.

Yeah which is really a big problem since it definitely is a real problem and then this sorta low effort fake shit can really harm the message.

Isn't this like really really low effort fake though? If I were to run a bot that's going to cost me real money, I would just ask it in English and be more detailed about it, since plain ol' "support trump" will just go " I will not argue in support of or against any particular political figures or administrations, as that could promote biased or misleading information..."(this is the exact response GPT4o gave me). Plus, ChatGPT4o is a thin Frontend of gpt4o. That error message is clearly faked.

Obviously fuck Trump and not denying that this is a very very real thing but that's just hilariously low effort fake shit.

The researchers believe the problem is that students are using the chatbot as a “crutch.” When they analyzed the questions that students typed into ChatGPT, students often simply asked for the answer. Students were not building the skills that come from solving the problems themselves.

I did? What are you trying to say?

It's not about using it. It's about using it ina helpful and constructive manner. Obviously no one's going to learn anything if all they do is blatantly asking for an answer and writings.

LLM has been a wonderful tool for me to further understand various topics.

A big local tech corp is trying to push facial recognition payment at my university campus. Turns out all people needed was a cup of free coffee. I'm serious.

Brazil said no to Twitter(X).

Manbaby said Starlink, his satelite internet service, will not listen to Brazil.

Manbay caves in and listens to Brazil.

We should stop paying journalists who have no idea what they're talking about. "Parrots actually don't know what they're saying" Yeah no shit

First of all, if you want to have a genuine argument, don't go out and throw sarcastic nonsense right out of the bat. You'd be pretty pissed if I said that you don't care about freedom of speech and that you suggest a total authoritarian society. I know that that's not the case and so should you.

And second, who decides what's harmful enough to ban? Should we ban anything that is harmful? Or should we only ban things the government deems harmful? Pretty sure many countries still consider LGBTQ communities harmful so if that's the case, they should be banned.

You don't get to decide who's being harmful and who's not (Should I also make clear that I'm not advocating pedos sharing CSAM or such criminals?). If you are the admin and you want your community to be certain way, please, by all means. Governmental ban? Hard no.

Also, if you ban them, they don't disappear just like that. If anything, the worst of them migrate and find somewhere else and make it even worse than it was. It's about addressing the root causes. Educate people, don't just push the problem out of sight. That's where we're failing. Let people realize that racists and nazis are below 60 IQ bigots and let people make fun of them. That's how freedom of speech should work.

I don't think I have to clarify that I meant banning social media and such.