sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Look of a refurbished thinclient with a 6th or 7th gen Intel CPU with the "T" at the end (for example i5 6500T). Those are basically power optimized mobile CPUs for desktop PCs. Those are currently best value for money IMHO.

Alternatively use an old laptop, which is great for beginners, but storage extension will be very limited.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 days ago

If all you want is Nextcloud, you are probably better off getting a managed service like this: https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-share/

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 week ago

Ice storage?

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Cockpit is a simpler choice for that.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is why I said it depends. There are many places where electricity cuts for a short duration are quite frequent. Often you don't even notice it, but a 24/7 server would be effected.

In general, I think the risk of laptop batteries catching fire is overstated especially if you limit the charge to 80% or so. So weighting these two issues against each other you can come out either way, but I think for most places it will come down towards a UPS being nice to have.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Depends. Usually it is still good as a UPS for a few minutes, and some laptops have a bios option to limit full charge which lowers the risk even further.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

While your post does mention notifications which really helps with engagement and was lacking from most forums, the main issue was IMHO lack of good mobile support of all the main forum platforms until as you said Discourse came along, but by then it was too late.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

Since Snikket is just an XMPP server, it can be used with desktop apps like Dino as well.

All the corporate gamification feature are probably quite annoying.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

It really is an enterprise solution and I doubt your family will be happy with it.

Why not just set up a Snikket server and use that? You can easily create group-chats and share pictures and videos there and the interface is similar to WhatsApp.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe https://picocms.org/

But Hugo is fine, no need to use all the advanced features.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

Works great with Akkoma as well.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It has pretty much stagnated in the English speaking part of the internet, and only saw a huge boost in popularity in Brazil recently (due to Twitter being newly banned there).

21
submitted 6 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I am not overly happy with my current firewall setup and looking into alternatives.

I previously was somewhat OK with OPNsense running on a small APU4, but I would like to upgrade from that and OPNsense feels like it is holding me back with it's convoluted web-ui and (for me at least) FreeBSD strangeness.

I tried setting up IPfire, but I can't get it to work reliably on hardware that runs OPNsense fine.

I thought about doing something custom but I don't really trust myself sufficiently to get the firewall stuff right on first try. Also for things like DHCP and port forwarding a nice easy web GUI is convenient.

So one idea came up to run a normal Linux distro on the firewall hardware and set up OPNsense in a VM on it. That way I guess I could keep a barebones OPNsense around for convenience, but be more flexible on how to use the hardware otherwise.

Am I assuming correctly that if I bind the VM to hardware network interfaces for WAN and LAN respectively it should behave and be similarly secure to a bare metal firewall?

80
submitted 6 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
103
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Looks like there will be a need for another fork 😒

Looks like this will be it: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict

31
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
116
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
23
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
18
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
42
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
88
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
14
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Interesting thread that summarizes it well.

66
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

This sounds like something Lemmy would also really benefit from.

134
submitted 7 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
view more: ‹ prev next ›

poVoq

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF