sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My university Linux cluster was my first introduction to Linux in general, and they ran MATE of all things.

A few years later, when I decided I was done with Window's bullshit and wanted to jump my daily driver to Linux, I installed Ubuntu MATE so I'd have the best familiarity edge I could to minimize friction.

MATE is alright. Despite being rather barebones and dated (being a life support fork of GNOME 2, I understand that is indeed kind of the point), it served me well for about 5 years.

I got a real urge to switch, though, due to just how little support or documentation there is for anything in MATE. I was also getting fed up with Ubuntu's Snap crap as well. So I decided to dump both for something else.

I wanted to stay on Debian's architecture for now, but no longer had need for Ubuntu's handholding, so raw Debian it was. As for the DE, I personally like the rich, full-fat ones more than the lean ones, and I wanted something modern, popular, and with highly proliferous support resources. That basically meant GNOME 3 or KDE Plasma. And I guess maybe Cinnamon, but I always see it marketed as the "newly ex-Windows user training wheels" DE, and that isn't my need.

GNOME 3 strikes me as the "MacOS" of Linux DEs. It wants to swim against the current to introduce its own paradigm. Everything designed to work in its ecosystem is buttery smooth and sexy, yes, but since it's also a counterparadigm, that tends to relegate you to the pack-in software and a handful of big vendors. Most other software has to rely on clumsy shims to fit in. I'm not about it, tbh. I'm sure it's fine, I just don't think higher highs are worth the lower lows, and I generally wasn't in the mood for a drastic paradigm shift.

So, KDE Plasma for me. It was unfortunate I made the leap just as they decided, "Wayland is stable and supported enough for everyone now!" (it isn't, lol), so it's a bit rockier than I was hoping, but whatever. Stability and support can only improve with time. And I expect faster adoption of Wayland than I do the GNOME 3 paradigm since Wayland is currently the only ship of its kind in the water that isn't sinking.

Aaaaall that said, KDE treats me pretty well, minus the Wayland issues. Upgrading to it from MATE was like trading up from a cheap, dingy hostel to a clean 4-star hotel. Should've leapt years ago.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Bottom should be Composer.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Static analysis won't save you from all of them, but they will definitely save you from the great majority of the ones ProgrammerHumor seems to get worked up about.

I still see people sharing ancient memes about pouring over code for hours looking for mismatched curly braces, missing semicolons, and greek question marks. These and the bulk of minor syntax problems like them should all be complete non-issues with modern tooling.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 64 points 1 year ago

It's 2023. If you're not using an IDE or a highly extensible text editor with simple static analysis features, I really don't know what to tell you.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I would classify it in the same mental bucket where I put activity and workout monitor apps that track steps or calorie goals.

Now, whether it actually produces consistent, net positive health results, I can't say either way.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

DreamWeaver.

And thank god for it, too.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I think those of us that treat social media services this way are a minority in the grand picture. If BlueSky continues to be effective, network effect will pull in a steady stream of users, including ones that may have balked before.

It is poising itself to be a 1:1 drop-in replacement for Twitter. Federated services like Mastodon aren't that (and aren't trying to be).

I wholly believe that the majority of Twitter users have no interest in federated platforms as alternatives. By comparison, platforms like Mastodon feel vaguely like Twitter but more fractured and isolated. Everyone was on Twitter. Comparatively no one is on Mastodon. Discovery is awful and micromanaging instances and subscriptions is tedious busywork. "Why can't it just be all in one convenient place, like on Twitter? This is so stupid and complicated," I expect most would complain.

Federated platforms are loved by us because we value the fine control and we like putting in effort to curate our feeds. The complexity is the appeal. But I think it's negative appeal to the type of person who has gotten accustomed to an algorithm doing all of that for them, and I think that's most people. You can use federated platforms out of the box and they'll "just work" without all the tinkering, but it will be very bland and vapid. It only becomes great when you put in work to make it great for yourself.

The thing BlueSky seems to be promising is that big, monolithic platform that Twitter was and most people want. And I think they're the only notable player in that game, so they'll completely corner that market. As long as they don't trip over any footguns (and I don't believe making the beta invite-only is one of them), I believe they're going to succeed greatly.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

At this stage that's kind of the point. It's an intentional demand-curbing measure. The number of people trying to switch to BlueSky outstrips hosting infrastructure. They're scaling up slowly and carefully.

I presume once it's out of open beta and they have the infra they need to launch properly, it will stop being invite ony.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Did you seriously just post a GNU/Linux interjection unironically?

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

SMS/RCS for friends/family in meatspace, Discord for friends in cyberspace.

Snapchat still seems to be a default conduit of communication for my family members and their respective friends. I do not have Snapchat and never will. They are mildly annoyed at my stubbornness.

I have yet to meet a single soul in my local circles who is willing to install any messaging platform over any concern of privacy or security. These are very simply not important factors to any of them. It's upsetting. But, y'know, lead a horse to water, etc.

Discord continues to be a choice platform for my online friends circle. I don't know so much about any of them, but I almost never use it for 1:1 private messaging. It's there for the rare aside conversation. But its primary form of use for me is as a big town square in servers with dozens of people. It's essentially my version of going to the mall after school or to the local pub after work.

[-] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Huh. So that's why they're found in Minecraft strongholds.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

pixelscript

joined 1 year ago