sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] pchem@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

No. Both CUPS and Netflix work perfectly fine for me on Arch.

You're probably confusing it with Alpine.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

Despite the memes, Arch isn't that hard to install nowadays. The Wiki is stellar and archinstall is a thing (as well as EndeavourOS).

But Debian testing is a fine choice as well, of course.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's based on Firefox, but those modifications do have a rather large impact in terms of privacy.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Outer Wilds had so many profound moments, imho. Just listing a couple more:

Spoilers, obviously

  • The core of the interloper
  • The dead Nomai in Dark Bramble (two of them in an embrace, iirc)
  • The messages from other Nomai tribes in the Vessel
  • Having to remove the warp core from the ATP
  • The number of loop iterations in the probe tracking module
  • The ending of the DLC

[-] pchem@feddit.de 16 points 11 months ago

In my experience, once you've got Arch set up, it less work to maintain than Manjaro. On Arch, you have noticeably more frequent, but smaller, package updates. On Manjaro, compatibility issues with the AUR may occur, which happened a few times for me, while that won't happen on Arch.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] pchem@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Keepass allows you to use a passphrase in combination with a randomly generated keyfile. You only need to copy the keyfiles to your devices once (not via cloud services, obviously). Your actual database can then be synchronized via any cloud provider of your choice (hell, you could even upload it publicly for everyone to see) and it would still be secure.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Of course, one doesn't have to install Arch manually; archiso and Endeavour are great conveniences and exist for a reason.

That doesn't change the fact that people who rely on those tools not because they want to save some time/effort but because they're unable to follow wiki instructions are likely better off with something other than Arch.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

And if one is not able to install Arch using archinstall, then they should question themselves if Arch is even the right distro for them.

Without wanting to be elitist, I'd go further than that. While archinstall is a nice convenience, even the "manual" installation is really just diligently reading and following the wiki guide.

If that's too much for you, you're likely going to struggle when stuff needs manual intervention and you're probably better off with a different distro.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is "I use zsh, btw." a thing yet?

Doesn't prevent the initial crash, of course, but there won't be one on the next boot.

[-] pchem@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That depends a bit on the ruleset. According to Guinness (where hyperventilating with pure oxygen beforehand is allowed), it's 24:37.36. According to the freediving organisation AIDA (where pre-breathing oxygen isn't allowed), it's 11:35

[-] pchem@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

What distros are there that have drive encryption but don't require decrypting the drive while booting? Isn't LUKS pretty much the standard disk encryption for all Linux distributions?

view more: next ›

pchem

joined 1 year ago