sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are you telling me they intentionally avoid playing Van Halen - Jump for anyone put on hold?

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 33 points 2 days ago

I for one prefer demon linux over fish linux. In fact, that's how I first dipped my toes into the world of unix-ish OSes with FreeBSD 3.3.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No.

First we need a better system for resource allocation. Monetary systems are extremely inefficient, but they're far better than the "trust me, bro" approach of many of the alternatives.

A global post-scarcity society could in theory take over, similar to how it works in Star Trek, but there are a lot of other hurdles that need to be overcome first.

As long as proper distribution of resources requires an effort, it will also need an incentive to do so. Currently this incentive is provided by allowing for a profit margin, and while this does also provide a mechanism for skimming off the top, at least said skimming can be somewhat controlled by a free market ensuring better circumstances for those willing to skim less.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 5 points 3 days ago

In my book WSL and VM share the same downside in that you're only abstracting Linux functionality in relation to the hardware.

Linux really shines when it has full access to the actual hardware as opposed to asking it's environment nicely if it's allowed to do something.

For example, I routinely need to change my IP address to talk to specific networks and network hosts, but having to step over the virtualisation or interpretation layer to do so is just another step, thus removing the advantage of running linux in the first place.

Sure, VMs and dual booting have their uses, but the same uses can be serviced by an actual linux install while also being infinitely more powerful.

I played around with WSL for a while, but you notice really quickly that it is not the real thing. I've used virtual box for some use cases, but that too feels limiting ad all of the hardware you want to fully control is only abstracted.

I would say that unless he has a really good reason why he wouldn't want to go for dual boot, then he should do just that.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

Seconded. I can endure most things except horrible FPS and/or stuttering.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Any suggestion for a manufacturer/vendor? I might actually need a few of this at work.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Running any software is inherently unsafe. It's basically the computer equivalent of eating something given to by a stranger, and you just have to trust them that it's good for you.

But we do it anyway, simply because we have to - not all of us are software devs with unlimited time on our hands.

It basically comes down to whether you trust the origin or not, as well as check the reviews/comments to gauge the reception of other users. If something fishy is going on, word spreads relatively fast.

Tip: While no means foolproof, if the software in question has a github repo, it adds a layer of trust, because that means anyone can review the source.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

Meh, init 6, you coward

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago

Throw in some F14 with Iranian livery as well.

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Seriously, though... 12 gauge gatling gun with choke tubes. Any reason why it wouldn't work?

16
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I have a Dell Latitude 5420 laptop with LMDE, running kernel 6.1.0-12. This laptop has a builtin I219-LM ethernet controller that I can see via lspci. Some research indicates that this needs the e1000e kernel module, so I grabbed it from Intel, compiled it, and installed it. There were some complaints during the compilation, but nothing more than the average compilation process. Plus, it shows up in lsmod. Afterwards, lspci -vv displays it with the e1000e driver:

0000:00:1f.6 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (13) I219-LM (rev 20)
        Subsystem: Dell Ethernet Connection (13) I219-LM
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
        IOMMU group: 15
        Region 0: Memory at a6100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
        Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 3
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
        Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
                Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
        Kernel modules: e1000e

However, when I do lshw, it is listed as unclaimed:

  *-network:1 UNCLAIMED  
       description: Ethernet controller  
       product: Ethernet Connection (13) I219-LM  
       vendor: Intel Corporation  
       physical id: 1f.6  
       bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.6  
       version: 20  
       width: 32 bits  
       clock: 33MHz  
       capabilities: pm msi cap_list  
       configuration: latency=0  
       resources: memory:a6100000-a611ffff  

...and of course, it's still not showing in ifconfig. So, where do I go from here? Did I miss anything obvious?

And just for the record, I know that the ethernet port is working. It worked fine in Win11 before wiped the PC completely.

34
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Title, basically. My old torture device needs to be replaced, and while it's been mostly working OK, printers have no excuse for being as shitty as they are. So therefore I am looking for suggestions.

Specs:

  • Must include a flatbed scanner
  • prints in color
  • Wifi connection preferred
  • No PaaS or IaaS bullshit
  • No driver weirdness. I'm going to use it on linux.
  • Available "anywhere".
  • Ability to sit powered and connected in my HarryPotteresque "server room" under the stairs for ages, unattended, and work without hazzle when I send it the bimonthly print job.

I know the geek community likes Brother. Any particular model?

For reference, this new printer will replace my aging Canon Pixma 4250.

188
686
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

...and I don't know which possibility is the least worrying

63
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Title, pretty much. I'm in a couple of niche communities, and thought I should expa d into more generalized communities. All things tech are of interest, really.

Which communities are you in?

108
submitted 6 months ago by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

12 Years ago I had a Sony Vaio. I quite liked it. Then in my next job, 2017 or so, I went for a Toshiba Portege, and absolutely loved it.

Guess what the above two have in common? Yup, they stopped making laptops for the professional market. So now I'm a bit at a loss. Any recommendations?

Requirements:

  • Lightweight and easy to carry around.
  • 13-15" display, preferably
  • Decent battery life
  • It absolutely must have an RJ45
  • Works well with linux
  • Good keyboard quality
  • ISO keyboard availability
  • Touchpad. Bonus points if it has the touchpad buttons ABOVE the pad itself.
82
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Summarized back story of this legendary beauty: When NZ was drawn into WW2, some heroes began thinking of armored defense. Bob Semple decided to make one, making this the best (and only) Kiwi tank ever built.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Semple_tank

163
Document leak (feddit.nl)
9
submitted 8 months ago by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/videos@lemmy.world

The second part of the title is my own interpretation. I fly myself from time to time (Only recreationally, I have no plans on going commercial. I like my current unrelated career), and have been made aware of the medical requirements for pilots. While strict rules should apply, the regulations are outdated. I find it naive to think that there aren't any pilots currently flying with, for example, ADHD, and while that would in most cases in itself be a disqualifying diagnosis for pilots, it's even more disqualifying if it's medicated.

The video is about a compelling story and focuses mostly on mental health, but I feel that it hilights the same underlying problem; Pilots are incentivized to keep quiet about mental health issue due to an outdated approach because of a ruleset that basically states "No medication, no diagnosis".

139
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

And I know we're mostly atheists here, but please keep the theological discussion to a minimum and appreciate the lighthearted hypothetical scenario for what it is.

210
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/linux@lemmy.ml

This is your annual reminder to do a snapshot (timeshift or whatever you prefer) before doing relatively minor changes to your system.

I was supposed to be in bed now, but instead I am stuck troubleshooting xorg refusing to start after an apt-get dist-upgrade.

And as far as friendly reminders go, I should've given myself an unfriendly reminder beforehand, as it's not the first time....

UPDATE: Fuck nvidia 545. All my homies hate nvidia 545. 535 4 lyf!

264
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by neidu2@feddit.nl to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Thanks to @redcalcium@lemmy.institute for providing a better link. This post originally linked to tomshardware.

view more: next ›

neidu2

joined 9 months ago