sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah I mean I think most people know that there are negative consequences that can happen, just like with any medical procedure. I’m just surprised by the fact that people might get a medical procedure then want to prevent all future people from getting it because they had a bad experience. Shows what I know about people.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’ll say I don’t buy this argument, though that’s just my opinion. I don’t think these politicians care one way or another what happens to people as long as they get more power. I find it far fetched to say they’re seeking power so that they can be cruel.

Cruelty is a means (or side effect), not an end.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow I’ve never heard of someone wanting to ban a medical procedure all together because they experienced an adverse effect of it. Thanks for the view into a psyche that I didn’t know about.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Granted, but that doesn’t really answer the question. I’m asking why they’re so insistent on doing it, not how they’re maintaining power despite being unpopular.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I’d like you to cite a source to back up that claim.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah here’s a take that resonates with my cynicism about Republican politicians. They literally see it as a way to get more numbers in the long run because they know it disproportionally affects poor people (ei forces them to have more kids) and they know they can get those people to vote for them through other manipulation.

Seems like a pretty long con though right? The same cynicism tells me these politicians just care about short term wins.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m not basing my statement (about American sentiment) on what I see on the internet though! The polls and votes seem to support abortion access.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

When somebody powerful does something perplexing, my guess is usually “because money”. Is that the case here? I’m not that informed about how politicians get their money…

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’d be really nice if they clustered by instance. Then one could theoretically follow all politicians in their favorite party without having to look them up manually.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes local subscribers is nice to know. Maybe not more important than total subscribers, but useful nonetheless. Especially on a small/specific instance where you get to know your instance-mates, you might want to know how many of them are following a thing and whether you’re about to introduce them to something entirely new.

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Well would you look at that

36

I don’t even know how to begin to figure this out. How many communities are there across every instance (or even just among those that are federated at all)?

[-] mookulator@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

The four-color theorem is pretty cool.

You can take any map of anything and color it in using only four colors so that no adjacent “countries” are the same color. Often it can be done with three!

Maybe not the most mind blowing but it’s neat.

5

My other instance has been down for two days and I’m not sure where to go to see updates/discussion etc.

After browsing this community I saw a few scattered posts reporting other instances going down.

When Lemmy.World was down a week ago it was equally hard to find an explanation and/or a place to discuss what what happening.

Is there a community or website dedicated to “instance x is down because y”?

0

Theoretically speaking of course ;)

If my home instance gets hacked, what’s the worst case scenario for my personal data?

0

I heard that the All feed aggregates content from all communities that instance members have subscribed to, meaning if I subscribe to a new community, it’ll start showing up in everyone else’s All feed.

Let’s suppose I have an account on an instance with a particular thematic focus. Should I avoid subscribing to communities outside of that theme, in order to preserve the purity of their All feed?

5

Is it possible to automatically subscribe to all (federated) communities with the same name?

Example in the screenshot: I want to follow !astronomy, and I don’t really care whether the content is coming from from Lemmy.World, kbin.social and mander.xyz - I just want to see it all.

Obviously I could manually subscribe to them all, but is it possible to do so automatically? Ideally if a new similar community pops up on another instance, I wouldn’t miss it.

I read here that community grouping is a thing, so that instances with identical communities can work together. Is that a feature that could work towards this end?

0

I read somewhere in here that other fediverse apps like Ice Cubes should be able to access Lemmy.World content to give one an experience similar to the Reddit app. I have Ice Cubes already for viewing mastodon posts and it works ok.

When I tried adding my account in Ice Cubes, it asked for an Instance URL.

I entered Lemmy.World and got the message “This instance is not currently supported”. Am I misunderstanding something, or is this not possible?

view more: next ›

mookulator

joined 1 year ago