sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] money_loo@lemmy.world -5 points 6 months ago

Yikes. Seek help, please.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is true.

I’m also wondering what OP was wearing when he took the phone in for repairs, seems like he was asking for it.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Sheesh, I remember playing the first one on my PSP and really enjoying it.

I wonder if it’s possible to jump back in to the series after all this time?

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

My wife doesn’t game either but holding a tablet for hours and months gave her “tennis elbow” and she was finally essentially ordered to quit by her doctor. Lmao.

This game is hella addicting.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I don’t remember the original looking that good, either. Weird.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

“Well that can’t be right because it’s made more money in 25 years than the entire house of mouse did in like 100” -Some Executive numbers guy, probably.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I’m specifically referencing all the fear mongers who think the AI is some evil threat and are still against its usage even under such a fair and restrictive contract.

This is really the best of both worlds for all parties, and as far as I could tell, the only people that might suffer are the consumers if the quality of the AI isn’t very good, but everybody else is still getting paid the same and more.

If you’re upset about that just because of the letters, AI then yeah you deserve to lose your job.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What?

I have no idea how you got there from me noticing the pertinent points of the contract, but if it matters I think all that loot box shit should be regulated or maybe even made illegal.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

The agreement has two parts--a development contract that governs the recording and creation of an AI voice (called a "digital replica" in the contract), and a contract that covers licensing and use of said digital replicas to develop a game.

In terms of compensation, voice actors will be paid a standard union fee for the initial recording session to create a digital replica, and further compensation if they wish to allow Replica Studio to continue to use the replica after a certain timeframe. Actors can also negotiate compensation for a replica to be created from previously recorded material, with the minimum payment equal to a standard recording session--this also covers deceased performers, if an agreement can be reached with their estate.

Actors can then license their digital replica to be used in games, with payment calculated per every 300 lines of dialogue or 3,000 words (with "words" also including other sounds such as monster noises.) Studios can also pay actors to get access to their digital replica for pre-production--for instance, using the AI voice for placeholder dialogue. If any of the replica's dialogue is used in a publicly released version of the game, the actor is entitled to further compensation.

They’re going to literally be getting more money for letting a computer talk for them only in the places and ways they allow them to, yet some people are STILL angry just hearing the letters AI and that’s good enough for them.

Jesus Christ, at this point they deserve to lose their work.

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Doesn’t it say “Wounds were altered”?

[-] money_loo@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Sounds like it’s gotten dusty inside or your hard drive is very close to full, or both.

That’s not normal behavior.

view more: next ›

money_loo

joined 1 year ago