sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

The job of CEO seems the far easier to replace with AI. A fairly basic algorithm with weighted goals and parameters (chosen by the board) + LLM + character avatar would probably perform better than most CEOs. Leave out the LLM if you want it to spout nonsense like this Amazon Cloud CEO.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Check out Pulsar

https://pulsar-edit.dev/

It's basically the continuation of Atom. It's got rough edges though regarding plugins but it's good enough to allow me to avoid VSCode.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago
[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I not sure this is true.

As I understand, humans have an extremely acidic stomach compared to other animals, even carnivores. Our stomach acid is on the level of scavengers, and this is to kill bacteria and parasites in the food we eat. Humans could be more tolerant of spoiled food than most other species.

The modern western diet/lifestyle can damage our digestive tract in ways that affect our pH and microbiome making us susceptible to what we should normally be tolerant of. Anyone taking antacids or dealing with heartburn type issues I would expect to more vulnerable to food poisoning since any pathogens can more easily pass deeper into their digestive tract.

The short digestive tract in a dog is all that is needed to extract nutrients from animal sources, digesting plants requires help from a microbiome and they need somewhere to live and do their work, this is why plant eaters have extensive digestive tracts that are not very acidic so they don't kill them off. Humans (not sure about other animals) neutralize the "chime" exiting your stomach so that it's pH is appropriate for the microbiome living in the intestines.

The human digestive tract suggest sit evolved for adaptability, a healthy human can safely eat anything from carrion (not saying it's fine, just that we evolved to be able to survive it), be a vegetarian, or eat mostly meat and thrive.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Check out "radiative sky cooling"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDRnEm-B3AI

There might be some way to do something with this.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Save a slap for the leap seconds creator.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Or, we could collectively realize time is but an illusion and transcend this silly problem.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You gotta ~~throw~~ fling your feces at them.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

All the waste a plant ever produces in its lifetime can be contained with ease on site.

Won't that create a bunch of targets all over the country? Then terrorists or enemy states can use simple small bombs to make whole areas uninhabitable for the next millennium.

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I don’t disagree with you, but this is unrealistic.

But...we don't have a choice if we are to survive. Continuation with any system like our current system (i.e. exploitation of nature for economic growth) will lead to obvious ecological collapse. Why is certain ecological collapse viewed as the more realistic choice?

This is akin to a person well on their way to a heart attack saying "well, eating healthy is unrealistic, so let's switch to diet coke and pretend that's enough"

[-] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Sometimes I use the term "psychopathic hoarder class" when referring to this group of people.

view more: next ›

mojo_raisin

joined 5 months ago