sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

In other words, they’re only interested in punishing the ones that get caught, and they’ll only process it well after it’s happened so they can just deliver a slap on the wrist.

By definition, you can only punish the ones that get caught.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I don't.

I'm a bit clumsy (ADHD) and having a cable attached to my body attached to a €1000 device is asking for trouble. I hate the cable getting tangled up, caught on things etc.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Good. We should be in the nuclear age now with an electric infrastructure already in place and looking forward fusion and renewables.

Trying to go from fossil fuels to renewables is too difficult a step.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Why would they need to declare anything? They already are pivoting away from fossil fuels as hard as they can.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

It's weird that he thinks of it as "blackmail" though, and a thing that's happening to "him".

Blackmail is when someone has damning evidence against you and they threaten to release it unless you do what they want.

We saw the damning evidence. It's been released. This is the reaction.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Jesus fucking christ mate turn it in.

He did a comedy show where he repeatedly professed respect fir trans people but criticised the way some people behave, and you're acting like he "isn't fond or minorities getting rights"

It's just fucking psychopathic gibberish with you lot.

If this guy was white he'd be racist against blacks.

What the fuck does that even mean?

He's black.

Calm the fuck down.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

I understand that's what people need to believe.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

Did you read the entire sentence "the British occupying forces in Berlin"

British. In Berlin.

Who do you think had lots of curry powder?

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Actually, I'm going to add something to my last reply.

"not wanting to be drowning in ads" is in no way shape or form a political decision.

If you mean "because adverts are capitalism" then you're part of the deeply naive problem.

It's perfectly plausible - because it literally has happened - for people to construct a platform under our system (which is also hybrid anywat) that allows for social media to exist without adverts.

You're literally the kind of person when I mean when I talk about trying too shoe-horn politics into things when it doesn't belong.

[-] letsgocrazy@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I see you can't understand the difference between zealotry and normal discussion.

"I don't want ro drowning in ads" doesn't have to mean "but trump is Hitler evil Jews did this blah blah everyone who isn't of my opinion is a murderer"

16
submitted 10 months ago by letsgocrazy@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.world

I seem to just open tabs and never close them, and then go through a cycle of anxiety wondering why I kept them open.

31
submitted 1 year ago by letsgocrazy@lemm.ee to c/android@lemmy.world

I realise I can have a shopping list, but sometimes I want to have some items as a binary option, yes or no.

view more: next ›

letsgocrazy

joined 1 year ago