sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

It's expensive, often less comfortable than my own home, and I like theatre in which the crowd plays a part in the experience,

This is why I don't understand the "big action movies need a cinema, small comedies you can watch at home" argument. My home theatre can replicate the big-screen action experience just fine, but a comedy with a crowd is immediately 35% funnier.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

...which side of this argument are you on?

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

"There's no benefit to physical media." "Yes there is." "Why are you defending corporations?"

...what?

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Clicking the link in Boost just opens it in my web browser. How do I actually subscribe?

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

You are, in fact, wrong.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

No? Words mean things. Enshittification is a deliberately driven business model, you're using it to describe random happenings.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Enshittification is a specific business model, not just "things becoming shit".

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

"Enshittification" has an actual meaning, and this isn't it.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago

It's unambiguous that it's not a person's actual name.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Making double your budget is basically breaking even, once you account for marketing costs and the cinema's cut of the take.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Video evidence is far more convincing than someone's say-so.

view more: next ›

koberulz

joined 1 year ago