sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 13 points 1 day ago

I like yml. Clean to read, easy to use, supports comments.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 6 points 6 days ago

Why are the alternatives all so defecatory...

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 14 points 1 week ago

I noticed that icon in the play store the other day. I assumed it was a scam/copycat app trying to be distinct enough to avoid a takedown or something.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 10 points 1 week ago

Great, now my apps can get AI anti-features and breaking bugs even faster

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 6 points 1 week ago

Never asked one. Answered my first one recently.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 16 points 1 week ago

Fundraiser to send CEOs on a French vacation?

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 22 points 1 week ago

Plus, the license was only changed on a secondary branch. The default branch still has the MIT license. The text at the top isn't "this is the license file you have open" it's "the repo is licensed under this" so it's correct behavior but bad UX. It would be most user-friendly to show repo license and then also say "this branch has an invalid license, beware shenanigans"

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's in reference to this: https://news.microsoft.com/source/asia/features/taiwan-hospital-deploys-ai-copilots-to-lighten-workloads-for-doctors-nurses-and-pharmacists/

Looks like the benefit/headline comes from use of the entire software suite that provides access to a patient's chart/medical history including checks for interactions/allergies. Most of that has nothing to do with AI but since it has a feature that generates a summary via a language model the whole thing is marketed as an AI Copilot.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

My Galaxy S21 can do that as well.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

I literally thought "Who's he?" when first opening the picture so I can understand the androgynous descriptor.

To save others the Google: british "synth pop" musical duo turned solo act.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Frankly AS did a lot of things well

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org -4 points 3 weeks ago

Amazing how many replies to your comment completely miss the point

58
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by key@lemmy.keychat.org to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I was reading an article on the new LG display with a refresh rate of 7680Hz and it says:

While a typical refresh rate for a monitor might be 60Hz-240Hz, an outdoor display designed to be viewed from a distance needs to be much higher

The idea that there's an intrinsic link between refresh rate and viewing distance is new to me and feels unintuitive. I can understand the need for high brighteness for far view distance. I also could understand refresh rate mattering for a non-persistent (CRT) display. But for an Led display surely you can see it far away even if it refreshes once a second?

Refresh rate normally needs to be high enough to avoid pixels "jumping" between refreshes on high resolution displays, so wouldn't higher view distances allow you to decrease the refresh rate?

Is the article just spouting bullshit? Or is there an actual link between refresh rate and view distance?

view more: next ›

key

joined 1 year ago