Well, that's a good point but I still think there are better services than Twitter/microblogging for that. Like our old friend RSS
Sure, but you can get that with something more long-form, too; it's not exclusive to Twitter/microblogging .
I would argue that the format incentivizes short quips and discussions lacking nuance in favor of brevity, and yes, therefore it's "bad" (to use their term) to use Twitter even if musk wasn't turning it into Truth Social.
Well, arguably the microblogging format does have some intrinsic disadvantages.
Are you speaking legally or morally when you say someone "aught" to do something?
You most certainly can. The discussion about whether copyright applies to the output is nuanced but certainly valid, and notably separate from whether copyright allows copyright holders to restrict who or what gets trained on their work after it's released for general consumption.
The article is literally about someone suing to prevent their art from being used for training. That's the topic at hand.
Are you confused, or are you trying to shoehorn a different but related discussion into this one?
I was under the impression we were talking about using copyright to prevent a work from being used to train a generative model. There's nothing in copyright that says anything about training anything. I'm not even convinced there should be.
There's nothing in copyright law that covers this scenario, so anyone that says it's "absolutely" one way or the other is telling you an opinion, not a fact.
I subscribed to releases! Good work so far!
Hey, I was up front about my data (or lack thereof) and we're not talking about climate change or string theory, we're talking about fast food delivery driver's onboarding.
"The Internet" would just state it like a fact.
I'm pretty sure Tasker can make non-dismissible notifications.
Though, if a notification will actually stop you from drunk dialing, you could always change your wallpaper to something like "Don't drunk dial".