sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 2 points 4 weeks ago

Since we're talking Ubuntu, I'd add

"flatpak update" and "snap refresh" to the cron

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 4 points 1 month ago

I've had really good experience with Genymotion android emulation on Linux, even on underpowered devices. Might work well to do video calls

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 2 points 2 months ago

Unless its something like Bitwarden where you can use it even if they go offline, can take an encrypted or unencrypted backup of your local passwords/accounts, and are FOSS so you can easily self-host your own version if anything happens where you want to cut ties (thanks Vaultwarden!). They're an awesome company and one I highly suggest supporting with a paid account

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 1 points 3 months ago

Thank you, I missed that

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 3 points 3 months ago

Most of this is right, but needs some things corrected.

LOS is kept up by individual maintainers of the devices, and so it can cover more of them. But that also means you expand your attack surface to lineage, maintainer, microg, etc. And that's just on supported devices. Unofficial devices are even more wild-west, having much delayed releases, OS updates, security updates, everything.

Not only that, but Lineage requires that you unlock your bootloader and often have your phone rooted to be able to do everything. This introduces special points of insecurity and possible issues in the future.

GOS is from a single source, for a single line of phones, and uses a designed method to load cryptographically signed ROMs onto the device, and then validate updates using the same method. The Play Services are sandboxed and disabled by default, so you can just never use them if you want. Overall, this makes for a more cohesive device. One that is more private and more secure. Especially so, when you can buy a new Pixel device and have guaranteed updates for as long as Google will do so for the same device.

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one -1 points 6 months ago

Lol nah, you weren't clear about not dismissing one view at all. I didn't get my feelings hurt, I used a literary structure of reversing the message to counter what you said, and I'd say it was pretty effective.

And please don't do that smarmy "u mad bro" schtick, because your word choices betray you. This wasn't a balanced and nuanced take. "Sentimentality ... far beyond your capacity to understand ... Some people are just simple ... " vs "bigger than you ... advancing humanity, easing suffering, and understanding the universe ... the drive to discover, to create and to shape the future of the planet". Your own preferences speak volumes. Now compare mine. What you read into my message is far more indicative than what the actual info is.

Maybe you were trying to say something different but your message was lost and muddied.

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one -2 points 6 months ago

People tend to value what makes them feel important more than the things that they do not want to or cannot participate in emotionally. It's easy to prioritize career and personal achievements over providing support and fulfilling the promises you made to others in making a community, something far bigger than you. Over advancing humanity, easing suffering, and understanding each the universe within each other. When those things are far beyond your capacity to understand and capability to do, they hold less interest to you than the simpler things you were conditioned to strive after in capitalist propaganda or toxic machismo. Accolades, success, and recognition are incredibly important and compelling. But so is the drive to heal, to create and to shape the future of the planet through love. Some people are just simple, though, and like things to remain simple.

Those who can, do it. Those who can't, manage it. Those who don't even comprehend, criticize it. By regurgitating platitudes.

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 8 points 7 months ago

There's anonymity and privacy. This keeps you private from other users, and they already keep you private from themselves other than the initial sign up. What this service isn't, and never has been, is anonymous. They don't want that and there are big usability issues with an extended anonymous user base. Decide for yourself what you need

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 4 points 9 months ago

I live at a place where I needed Starlink so I feel entitled to comment.

Ordered, and it took 6-7mo to allow me to start. In the meantime T-Mobile Home Internet let me start immediately. I kept both because when one had issues the other would be better (storms, updates, tower maintenance, downtime, Russian attacks, etc). But I noticed that Starlink kept getting worse. Lower speed, worse jitter/ping/bufferbloat/etc. it would routinely fail to hit 100mbps down with good sky view, mounted to a pergola. TMHI would routinely be above 250mbps, and I move to using it more often. Eventually a local ISP got a grant to roll out FttH in my area and I got rid of both.

It's been a bit over a year since then, maybe things got better. But I noticed Starlink overselling their nodes, being non-communicative for support issues, and missing these easily attainable FCC goals to people that often have much less options than I did. There's no reason for them to get absolutely wiped by a cell phone tower. Hope they made enough by packing on customers, because they just lost $900m

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago

OLED over transflective, do you get all the bright colors but it can go transparent and use the sunlight readable and low power screen when that makes sense

[-] jawsua@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago

Highly agreed, and I came from Standard Notes most recently. Desktop, web, mobile, syncing, and does it all well enough I bought the upgraded pro version to support the model

view more: next ›

jawsua

joined 1 year ago