sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

That is what the Chinese leadership likes to claim. That it’s cultural, and their culture is one of trade and cooperation, not expansion. And I don’t doubt that they are earnest in saying that. I mean they truly believe themselves to be different. But we know that once a power becomes global, i.e. when its interests and investments extend well beyond its borders, its military presence will also expand, and it will engage in conflict to protect said global interests. Whether it’s the US, Russia, or China, the dynamic at a certain level is the same. China is already growing a more formidable army and expanding into the South China Sea. This is only the beginning.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Lusted after one as a teenager but could not afford one. It was a bit of a luxury item where I grew up.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

Among the sad stories about climate scientists having to deal with misinformation and abuse on the regular, suddenly, a unicorn: a statement purportedly by Musk that I wholeheartedly agree with:

Musk wrote in January: "People on the right should see more 'left-wing' stuff and people on the left should see more 'right-wing' stuff. But you can just block it if you want to stay in an echo chamber."

Of course with the average Xitter post becoming ever more toxic, most people that have anything of value to add will probably leave sooner or later, whether lefties or righties or whatever.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Probably because many local women would outright reject the Taliban, as partners and as masters, if they had a say. Educated women especially would run circles around them.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Respectfully, I do not see how this falls under trolling. Trolling would assume that the poster is disingenuous. But nothing that I have seen suggests that he was. And I do not think that moderators should make such calls. You may feel that something is “nonsense” but that does not mean you should exercise what little power you have to silence people, unless they clearly violate commonly agreed upon rules. Anyway, I don’t have a horse in this race, only reason I’m speaking up is because I see more and more forums that could host lively debate turn into circlejerks.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ok but my question was did he break any rules? Is all propaganda forbidden on here, only Chinese propaganda, how do we decide? Or is it up to the mod’s discretion to decide what propaganda is undesirable and remove it?

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t know what was said, but is that a rule on here now? That you can just remove anything you deem to be CCP propaganda? I have noticed that nearly anything that can be construed as pro Russia or pro China is downvoted to hell on here. But so far I hadn’t noticed posts outright removed by mods. This feels wrong on so many levels. Why not let people express their opinion so long as they do not do it in an offensive manner?

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly, everything was measured by how well Intel did, they were the undisputed standard bearer.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

IBM went through a huge transformation. More than one probably. Most if not all giant firms have had to reinvent themselves many times over. I remember the pivot from a technology company to services and consulting, which was hugely controversial, as I got to see that relatively up close. I won’t forgive them for giving up thinkpad though.

[-] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

And to think I grew up at a time when Intel reigned supreme. My my.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

gcheliotis

joined 1 year ago