sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Copyright laws protects the ability of copyright holder to make money. The laws were created before AI and now obviously have to be adapted to new technology (like you didn't really need copyright before the invention of printing). How exactly AI will be regulated is in the end up to society to decide, which most likely will come down who has the better lobby.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

And I just disagree that kids stuff means that it should be lower quality. I think it's just lazy. And while I understand why people are producing bad content - I don't have to like it or applaud them for it.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sure (also I can't think of any examples) - but than again the question becomes more complex and subjective: what is a good kids movie. But really often kids movie is used as an excuse for bad execution, art, storytelling, acting etc. - while I think kids deserve at least the same quality as adults maybe even better - since media has much more influence on children than on adults.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago

The idea that children don't deserve good media is kind of wild to me.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Rather obvious punk.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's just what comes with internet becoming mainstream so mainstream cultural standards are applied to online conversations. It's the difference between an opera and a punk club or something.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Photography can be art as well as AI generated images can be art as well. AI is a tool and people can create art with it. But also what is art is completely subjective to the viewer.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sure, I even do photography professionally form time to time - I just don't consider it to be a painting.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

With this logic photography is a painting, painted at an impossible high speed - but for some reasons we make a difference between something humans make and machines make.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

It's not an argument it's an analogy, that can help understand the argument.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Wtf? Just could not believe, had to check it out for myself. What's wrong with people.

[-] gap_betweenus@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

Still here?

Doubt you will ever know what an appeal emotional logical fallacy is.

Again, we are talking about empathy and you clearly show that you don't get it. Which was my point to begin with. Sorry mate to be the one bringing you the news.

view more: next ›

gap_betweenus

joined 5 months ago