sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

They've been around forever as a concept I think I even have one for accessing some servers at work. You're right no one uses them.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

You need to be on pills.

Base load is the amount of charge that you need in the system to deal with just basic usage. This includes powering your computer so you can post incoherent rents on the internet. Something I assume you think is very important.

Without base load when it's night and not windy all the power goes out, I assume you would think that was inconvenient even though you are not a mega corporation.

Now rather than trying to deflect answer the question how do we supply fundamental power when the sources are renewable are not operating and don't say we can store it in batteries because we can't not at that capacity.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At one point the organization I work for had a password that was literally Password-022!, guess what it was the following month?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't want my government hosting my email.

The last time they had to do anything important they stoled all the sensitive data in plain text in an Excel spreadsheet and then the spreadsheet got corrupted so they lost everything. Of course they didn't have backups.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

I think you actually have to buy a passkey device. Then configure it to work with a particular account.

You plug the passkey into your computer and then whenever it asks for a password you literally touch it and it does its thing. I think there are options like biometrics that you can add on top but you don't have to have that.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

The landing pad wasn't really at risk. If they had hit it it would have been relatively low speed, by the time it was at the catch attempt it was at like 30 km/h or something. Hitting a big steel object at that speed would have probably done more damage to the booster than anything else

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 2 days ago

It's difficult for the average person to really understand why this is a major innovation. Showed this to my parents and my dad's comment was "haven't they already done this?". If you don't realize it's a different rocket it does look basically the same as what they've been doing for years now.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 2 days ago

Elon Musk is working on the cars though. They look like they'll handle like the 2077 cars as well.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Right but how about actually addressing the question?

What about base load then. It's all well and good building shit tons of solar panels and wind farms but sometimes you need energy and the sun isn't shining and it isn't windy. What do you do then?

That's why we need base load and I'd rather the base load came from nuclear than from fossil fuels, as I'm sure you would too, but you seem to be anti-nuclear as well, so what do you want?

I'm so sick of you eco warrior types with absolutely no understanding of the problem. It's not as if the internet doesn't exist it's not as if you couldn't educate yourself if you wanted to. People are out here trying to educate you all about it, and you cope by ignoring them.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder if NASA would ever bring back the space plane idea they had before the space shuttle plan got co-opted by a bunch of interest groups and turned into the boondoggle that it became.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

The best thing for humanity now would be for multiple people to develop reusable spacecraft. For greater chance that someone will land on a new innovation.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

Right but they've achieved absolutely nothing other than being mildly annoying. Doesn't really seem like it would be worth funding.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

echodot

joined 1 year ago