sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

It is, eg lidocaine patches. It has to be injected to really do much. Not aware of any injectables that are over the counter.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Its part of wada rules to which the ioc is compliant? Drug test results for these organization are often published, at least they are for my powerlifting org

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

This may be helpful from a cost / gram of protein but its a bit misleading on the grams protein/ 100 g axis for beans - those are the dry bean numbers.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

This guy could have gone trach/vent 60 years ago and been mobile on wheelchair.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee -2 points 6 months ago

Death to America.

Winning hearts and minds!

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

+1 for obsidian! Have you tried out text generator plugin? Uses GPT api's. Haven't gotten into D&D but seems like it'd be a great tool for DMs to help make content.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Looks like it just matches long term inflation, beats 2023 inflation. Win for workers.

During the observation period from 1960 to 2022, the average inflation rate was 19.0% per year. Overall, the price increase was 1.36 million percent. An item that cost 100 pesos in 1960 costs 1.36 million pesos at the beginning of 2023. For October 2023, the year-over-year inflation rate was 4.3%.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

The author did a poor job of explaining that. He’s referencing the thought experiment of a businessman instructing a super effective AI to make paperclips. Given a terse enough objective and an effective enough AI, one can imagine a scenario in which the businessman and the whole world in fact are turned into paperclips. This is obviously not the businessman’s goal, but it was the instruction he gave the AI. The implication of the thought experiment is that AI needs guardrails, perhaps even ethics, or else it can unintentionally result in a doomsday scenario.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

You have details about her case you’d care to share?

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"unable to exercise its sovereignty" is falling a bit short so if you'll allow me to put words in your mouth:

Palestine is not a sovereign state.

  • barrbaric

I think most of the hex bear posters in this thread would not make this statement so kudos to you for being consistent, we agree to disagree on the meaning of sovereign and whether Taiwan and Palestine meet that mark.

[-] diablexical@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The dispute at this point is over how we define a country, especially because Taiwan clearly falls in a grey area within that definition. I claim that they are fundamentally unable to exercise their sovereignty given they aren’t formally recognized as a country by even their greatest allies and benefactors, thus they fail. You claim that they can fulfill the roles of the state, have a national identity, and have various semantic work-arounds for that fundamental illegitimacy, thus they pass.

I am willing to agree with you (albeit with some rephrasing there) if you were at least consistent. So, do you consider Palestine to be sovereign or not. I consider them sovereign. I am consistent. For you to be consistent in your views would require you to view Palestine to lack sovereignty. Mind you China recognizes Palestine as sovereign. If you say yes they have sovereignty then it demonstrates you're just trying to bring politics into semantics which in truth is what's going on in this whole thread. A political faction is attempting to coop the language to suit their narrative whether it requires logical consistency or not.

view more: next ›

diablexical

joined 1 year ago