sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 35 points 5 days ago

$13B is 7% of Apple's annual profit in 2022. Not a rounding error. Somebody has to settle for golden yachts instead of platinum next year.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Dr. Chopp retired. Luckily Dr. Peter Ruff is still available at the same practice. https://urologyaustin.com/doctors/peter-ruff-md/

Is that nominative determinism or did they legally change their names after choosing the career?

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

John Wayne toilet paper. Rough, tough, and doesn't take shit off of anyone.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

You saying they might have an unexpected dangling pointer?

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

Do they make them with LiPos? Everything I've ever owned had sealed Lead/Acid batteries. Really hard to cause any damage with those.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago

They're also adding a lot more incompatible text formatting and shit to keep Android incomplete with their real chat protocol. Gotta keep those teens bullying Android users. Also E2E encryption would be nice, but the EU didn't force them to do that.

Still great because MMS is garbage and ruins photo and video quality.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Ok now we know why their alignment team quit.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

The fingerprinting I'm talking about gets encoded in the screen recording too. Subtle pixel changes here or there over the entire length of the video. It'll be lossy when it's transcoded, but over the whole video it's there enough times it won't matter. Even scaling to lower quality won't fix it and then it'll also be lower quality.

It'll be like DRM, there will be people trying to remove it like anything else. They'll break one thing and another will come along. There would still be a black market, but most people can get an unrestricted copy in exchange for money so there's one less reason to pirate.

Unless you're actually pointing a camera at the screen, then OK, you do you.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

They could offer a way to download a copy and steganographically tag it to hell with your id so that they know if you distribute it. You can "loan it out" by letting friends stream off your Plex or whatever. If you start selling that streaming service or it shows up in torrents, it has your ID on it.

Boom, you own it forever and you're incentivized not to over share.

Or you know sell DRM free versions and let people do whatever, but that probably has a snowballs chance in hell.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I got curious. It's at least partially the government regulation thing. They've been working on standards that get inforced soon around data privacy and updates to software. So they can roll their own Chinese version of the software with in-country servers, privacy compliance, surveillance compliance, etc. or pay Baidu/Tencent.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chines-mandatory-standards-vehicle-cybersecurity-icv-data-%E6%8C%AF%E5%BC%BA-%E7%84%A6-qupec

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

This coincides with Kia/Hyundai announcing the same thing. Either they need Baidu tech to compete with BYD in the Chinese market because it's just that good or locally desirable. Or the countries regulators require it. Given they all announced this at the auto show at the same time, seems too coordinated for competing car companies.

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

Wow that's literally the whole article in the headline.

view more: next ›

designatedhacker

joined 1 year ago