sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 23 hours ago

Y Tu Mama Tambien with my sister and her new boyfriend.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 25 points 2 days ago

Threads used to bewilder me until I started using Haskell. Holy shit that felt like magic, turning an app parallel with two lines of code.

Now, I just have to worry about memory limits….

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago

At least in the cannabis industry here, they have a piece of software that they use to submit their inventories to the state. My current plan is to look into incorporating my system into that so I get accurate reports that are required by law to be done anyway.

I’d love to discuss further the pitfalls of my idea and any special considerations I might need to make.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m not sure yet TBH, but you’re welcome to help or build your own.
I intend to make it an entirely free and open source platform that allows retailers to broadcast their inventory to aggregators. No ads just like Lemmy, though I suppose that the feed itself serves as kind of an ad.

It was intended for the cannabis industry. Then the plan was to roll it out to the rest of the retail world when it has evolved enough.

There’s also veilid.

I even started a community here: https://infosec.pub/c/lemventory

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago

I’ve been looking into building this. I was originally planning to fork Lemmy to do it but now it looks like NOSTR might be better suited to it.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If it’s as bad as it is in the US, they ALL want to privatize it.

I’ll never forget Joe Lieberman swooping in and literally letting health insurance companies completely rewrite (destroy) the Affordable Care Act from an incremental step toward Single Payer into a law that codifies their profiteering. It put everyone into three categories:

A.) people who make more than their incredibly low income means testing are required to shop for expensive private health insurance on the free market. Health insurance companies literally raised their rates right after this. Because of Joe, health insurance profits, medical bankruptcy, and death from being under/uninsured (70,000 people per year) are at an all-time high! Any real illness won’t be covered and you’ll be forced to cover it with a GoFundMe!

B.) people who face stiff fines if they don’t have health insurance (neoliberal paternalism much like charging people for plastic bags and sugary drinks)

C.) people who somehow manage to sneak in under the means testing income bar! If you are 300% or more below the actual poverty line, you get the most bare bones medical insurance possible!

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago

Thanks for pulling it out of me.

Kind vibes to you, friendly and intellectually honest fellow fediverse Lemmy user. 🙏

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

“I” seem to require? No. I’m deferring to the cypherpunk manifesto which rings true over and over again.

IMO, anonymity should be able to be switched on and off at will by the user. Selective disclosure using homomorphic encryption coupled with digital identity can achieve both, IMO.

In particular, businesses require anonymity in much of their chain of custody…and I think that’s fair.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It was because I thought the author both understood and even agreed with my point in principle but then did intricate mental gymnastics to disagree with my point and let everyone off the hook including the person that I was disagreeing with.

I don’t want to continue talking in circles with Centrists telling me that the piss pouring on my head is in fact charitable rain drops from the benevolent libs.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was thinking about that just now.

They did Corbyn dirty in almost exactly the same way that they did Sanders. It has been worst-case-scenario from there on out.

Have they fully privatized NHS yet?

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

Perhaps. I tend to listen to Snowden when it comes to tech. But I haven’t used it yet because all of the implementations I could use involved a bitcoin wallet. I’m a fan of crypto but that felt weird.

Someone else reassured me that NOSTR is a very open platform and that requirement wasn’t true.

From my research, I have found it to be far more decentralized than Lemmy’s (and the pub/sub) federated model, which would also, obviously have the same drawbacks that we see in other truly decentralized tech like crypto, torrents, and tor where you are on your own in the world, forced to literally keep the ocean of shit from infecting you! 😉

So, I think of those things as necessary evils. For example, if I used NOSTR, I could have an address that follows me no matter what. That cryptographic hash is my NOSTR identity for better or worse. That’s pretty powerful and far more secure than a two step verification process in the long run.

I don’t know enough about it yet. But I’d say it is a raw technology that I wouldn’t allow the criminals and trolls of the world define for me.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

Are the people who invented this aware of NOSTR?
If so, what makes this different? And if not, perhaps we could use NOSTR to bridge the gap in the fediverse at the moment between NOSTR users and Mastodon/Pixelfed/Lemmy/KBIN/MBIN users

I started forking Lemmy for an inventory system but then realized that NOSTR was far more suited to that and other applications that require security and encryption.

https://nostr.org

69

A brief history of Megaupload and its controversial founder Kim Dotcom. Find out how a teenage hacker built one of the largest websites in the world, which was eventually seized by the FBI for piracy.

289
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by demesisx@infosec.pub to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

Am I out of touch?

No, it's the forward-thinking generation of software engineers that want elegant, reliable, declarative systems that are wrong.

373
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by demesisx@infosec.pub to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Am I out of touch?

No, it's the forward-thinking generation of software engineers that want elegant, reliable, declarative systems that are wrong.

84
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by demesisx@infosec.pub to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I’ve been thinking lately about the concept of the fediverse and repurposing it toward the goal of creating a free and open, decentralized, federated network of vendors that run instances or groups of vendors that run one instance together. These instances would broadcast inventory updates to each node that they federate with. It would start off niche and gain traction that way before branching out into other retail types.

Is this a feasible idea? Has any pulled this off? Wayfair, Amazon, Shopify, and Etsy are already suffering from enshittification. Someone needs to take the inventory out of the walled gardens and back into the customer’s hands. I shouldn’t have to rely on Google to find products I want. There are vendors that want to sell me stuff nearby…it’s just a problem of connecting the user to the content..and this seems like a no-brainer.


I’d love to have a discussion about this. I am seriously considering creating a rolling fork of Lemmy that would maintain parity but also add this functionality but I want to talk to experts and weigh the pros and cons before embarking on such an ambitious project.

edit: I also started a community ( https://infosec.pub/c/federated_inventory ) dedicated to the discussion of this idea. I'm trying to get vendors in a budding local industry to fund the creation of this system, which would branch out into all retail industries eventually along with the network effect.

14
submitted 11 months ago by demesisx@infosec.pub to c/guitars@lemmy.world

This seminar/clinic was held at the Musicians Institute (today named: MI College of Contemporary Music), Hollywood, on the 6th of June, 1993.

► See my free interactive transcription at https://www.soundslice.com/slices/n1kcc

► Visit the Ted Greene Archives at https://tedgreene.com

CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 VHS-tape nostalgia 00:00:17 Introduction 00:02:43 “What it means to be in a key” 00:13:10 The cultural acceptance of new harmonic intervals 00:20:15 “Bach-type harmony” + A Whiter Shade of Pale (Procol Harum, 1967) 00:28:09 From Bach to Jazz + Autumn Leaves (Joseph Kosma, 1948) 00:35:09 Harmonic “eras” 00:40:41 Four Gypsy-Jazz scales ————— 00:50:32 Send in the Clowns (Stephen Sondheim, 1973) 00:57:43 Why T.G. tunes down his guitars, part 1 01:00:06 God Bless the Child (Billie Holiday & Arthur Herzog Jr., 1939) 01:04:23 Why T.G. tunes down his guitars, part 2 01:06:08 Improvisation 01:15:25 Q&A 1: “Which are the musicians you listen to?” 01:17:16 Q&A 2: On what instruments T.G. plays besides guitar 01:18:43 Q&A 3: On T.G. playing right-handed guitar when being left-handed 01:19:56 Q&A 4: On using the higher artificial harmonics, the 17th degree, and “crazy” out chords 01:25:16 Music theory: “It's just an alphabet!” 01:28:09 Q&A 5: On how to pick the artificial harmonics / “chimes” for close harmony 01:34:07 Q&A 6: “I wanted to ask you to play a song: Do you know Naima by John Coltrane?” 01:35:55 Like Someone in Love (Jimmy Van Heusen & Johnny Burke, 1944) 01:41:35 Improvisation + Eleanor Rigby (The Beatles, 1966) 01:48:05 Q&A 7: “Can you talk a bit about counterpoint? ...” 02:04:30 Q&A 8: “Ted, do you find any chords you don't like?” + “Studying systems of voicings” 02:07:57 Goodnight

  • I do not own this material. I re-upload this to mold it for the purpose of free music education.

This clip already has a bit of history here on YouTube: – In 2008, @clubsandwedge was the first man on the scene and uploaded the first hour of the seminar. These were the early days of YouTube when the video length was limited to 10 minutes, so this was uploaded in 6 parts:

• Ted Greene 1993 GIT Seminar pt1
– In 2011, @GetBackToNowhere re-assembled the parts, now that the limit had been lifted, and uploaded the first hour under the title “Ted Greene Clinic”. This is still the video with by far the most views:

• Ted Greene Clinic
– In 2020, @astravert recovered the complete two-hour video tape, and the seminar finally surfaced in its glorious entirety (except for the first 17 seconds of noodling). Unfortunately, the audio and video were out of sync from the old VHS-tape, which made particularly the second hour painful to watch:

• Ted Greene - Rare FULL Seminar - 6/6/...
– In 2021, @gurayozcana improved the sound quality and painstakingly rescued the synchronization:

• Ted Greene - Rare FULL Seminar - 6/6/...
– This present video is the complete and synchronized version, with the volume re-adjusted, the colors adjusted, and the first 17 seconds of noodling added back in. The transcription and subtitles are currently works in progress.

** Notice the angelic light over Ted Greene: Although it looks like 90s camera technology, this is actually the holy aura that tends to glow around guitar gods! \m/ \m/ R.I.P., Ted Greene (1946–2005)

view more: next ›

demesisx

joined 1 year ago