sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] corbs132@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There's a great behind the bastards podcast episode about this guy!

[-] corbs132@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think your last sentence is congruent with what you were saying before it.

You're saying a CEO will opt for conglomeration because it either increases the value or decreases the volatility of the company because the CEO has lots of stock in the company. If that's the case, how is it bad for the shareholders, of which the CEO is a major player?

corbs132

joined 1 year ago