sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] corbin@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago

Because it’s an additional source of revenue, and they can provide rewards outside of YouTube.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you don’t like Google keeping a cut, then sign up for all the Patreons for everyone you watch.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago

If you like this article, please consider following the site on Mastodon/Fedi, email, or RSS. It helps me get information like this out to a wider audience :)

[-] corbin@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think I've had issues with reddit, as long as you use the link to the reddit comment thread, not one of the shortlinks or the video link or something else.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub -2 points 3 weeks ago

Weird way to say you would do anything but support creators directly.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have informed myself. There is nothing personally-identifiable in the data Mozilla collects in Firefox: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/telemetry-clientid

Technical data includes information about your Firefox version and language, device operating system and hardware configuration, memory, basic information about crashes and errors, outcome of automated processes like updates and safebrowsing. When Firefox sends data to us, your IP address is temporarily collected as part of our server logs. IP addresses are deleted every 14 days.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago

There's a lot of people on here that see literally any telemetry or analytics as evil, even though it's a necessary component for any software at the scale of Firefox (especially automated bug reports). Mozilla makes it clear they collect as little data as possible: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/telemetry-clientid

[-] corbin@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago

Telemetry is not privacy-invading, it's pretty well anonymized. It's also a lot easier to change the search engine than it is to download a completely different web browser.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub -1 points 1 month ago

Game publishers are not your friend.

[-] corbin@infosec.pub -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Gentleman's NDA" is not a thing. It's either a legally-binding NDA or it's not. It's within Valve's right to ban him from the game but saying the game shouldn't be covered at all is silly.

23
submitted 1 month ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@beehaw.org
112
submitted 1 month ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@beehaw.org
30
submitted 2 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@beehaw.org
60
submitted 2 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
284
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
76
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@beehaw.org
22
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.ml
161
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
54
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
143
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
265
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
36
submitted 3 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@beehaw.org
view more: ‹ prev next ›

corbin

joined 1 year ago