sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)
[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

oh ok. Thanks :)

16

Hello, I wanted to ask what you have to do to be added to the join-lemmy.org page? Is there an email to call? The documentation only reads that you have to meet certain criteria, but is it then added automatically at some point?

55

The fediverse is now something that you can evangelize about. Its turning into a buzzword ...

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks for the explanation. Didn't realize Bluesky/AT is more like a fedi-washed version of ActivityPub rather than a real alternative ...

I'm not sure; on the one hand, I think the fact that federation has become a unique selling point in micro-blogging is indicating a positive trend; so even if people join Bluesky its good for the Fediverse. On the other hand, if federated just becomes another buzz word that means nothing at all, while places where the real innovation is happening are drowned out, the window of opportunity could just close.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I think its a cool idea. I had a similar idea once: https://fungiverse.wordpress.com/2024/07/27/floo-network-anouncement/ but for the whole social web instead of just Lemmy.

Its interesting, it could get overwhelming easily though. Maybe this could be solved by only showing instances of a certain size?

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

:D good one. My new favourite take on nostr.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago

Even if it doesnt have much impact on activitypub-fedi, I think this is good news for the fediverse in general. X is loosing more and more relevancy and microblogging is more and more happening on federating services.

313
[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Its less open, but its definitely federated. Whether its a walled garden or not depends on the definition ;)

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure something like this will be the killer app for the Fediverse.

I think its more a transition-app as long as we have protocol wars. Most people are good with having access to the majority of the Fediverse and probably dont even know about the others.

Its still a great idea!

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Regarding 2: you can also join the Fediverse this way with certain clients I believe. You are automatically signed up for lemmy.world for example

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Piefed has topics, so different fediverse communities can be viewed through the Fediverse-topic for example

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It was an interesting read. I'm willing to do certain parts of that like listening more to marginalized voices. What bugs me though is that basically the text says that we need to disrupt the system, because its racist; but on the other hand, it basically assumes that the system was and always has been racist. And this is again identity politics: based on Focaults post structuralism; societal, liberal progress is a myth, etc. etc. There is no actual believe in societal progress (which I do believe in primarily through technological progress).

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I think the topic of racism and discrimination needs to happen on the Fediverse if its an issue. However, I'm worrying that your approach is more counterprodctive. I think its fine to ask for proof for the supposed racist culture on Lemmy, because I think every argument needs to have some argumentative ground. I'm against discrimination (which certainly happens on the Fediverse), but I dont think identity politics have come up with productive tools to tackle the issues they point out.

56
52
47
117
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
-34
54

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13519639

Provider-Exclusive: “There is only the app of my provider.”

Provider-Centric: “There exist other apps, but the one I’m using is the main one.”

Service-Centric: “There is no main one and I’m trying to use the one that fits my ideal the best.”

Protocol/Ecosystem-Centric: “There exist other protocols/ecosystems, but mine is the main one.”

Fediverse-Principle: “There is no main one and I’m trying to use the one that fits my idea of an open ecosystem the best.”

Current state of different web2 apps:

-31
77
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by blue_berry@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
104

Provider-Exclusive: “There is only the app of my provider.”

Provider-Centric: “There exist other apps, but the one I’m using is the main one.”

Service-Centric: “There is no main one and I’m trying to use the one that fits my ideal the best.”

Protocol/Ecosystem-Centric: “There exist other protocols/ecosystems, but mine is the main one.”

Fediverse-Principle: “There is no main one and I’m trying to use the one that fits my idea of an open ecosystem the best.”

Current state of different web2 apps:

view more: next ›

blue_berry

joined 1 year ago