sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 6 months ago

No way, Debian uses systemd, and systemd uses systemd-journald for logging, and doesn't need cron, because it has timers.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 6 months ago

My real first time using Linux was with Pop!_OS in April last year.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 6 months ago

The difference here is more between release types, I think. Arch is rolling, so there are updates you can get every few minutes. Debian is a rock, and rocks aren't known for moving a lot.

(The command is sudo pacman -Syu btw)

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 6 months ago

At least for me, there wasn't an equivalent replacement.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 6 months ago

I haven't had laptop-related issues on either

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 26 points 6 months ago

I prefer Krita

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

you're usually only using one at a time.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 6 months ago

smh get real, install Hyprland and 50 utilities for it (30 of those are sway utilities)

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 14 points 6 months ago

you're right, installing pandoc on arch really comes with a lot of bloat. Iirc it's >200 haskell libraries.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 110 points 6 months ago

It's not bloat if you use it.

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi -1 points 6 months ago

Mac is when you're still small and don't have a concept of gender

[-] backhdlp@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 6 months ago

no way anyone would voluntarily use apt after using pacman

view more: ‹ prev next ›

backhdlp

joined 9 months ago