sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] ____@infosec.pub 38 points 2 weeks ago

Content? Hardly.

Disinformation. Lies. Etc.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

Probably cheap at the price compared to burning Jet A by the tens or hundreds of gallons.

Not that I am unconcerned about the resource usage. Lesser of two evils.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

At one time, Reddit (or at least the core server) was open source. Statistically, it's relatively likely that someone, somewhere forked and is maintaining that code for their own purposes to this day, but I'm not actively aware of any examples.

If someone has been maintaining a fork, I'd love to see the old comment database imported into it and made available, though I don't know offhand what license either the code or the comments were released under.

A FOSS Reddit, without the chaos that took over America during the presidential administration installed in 2016, and branching from there, would be an interesting point of diversion to say the least.

Edit: quickie DDG search found me one fork archived in 2023 and a further form updated a year or so ago. That’s recent enough the damn thing just might build with a little work.

2023 fork of open source reddit

~2024 fork

I’m sure there are others…

[-] ____@infosec.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago

And no asinine private jet commute required for the AI CEO...

[-] ____@infosec.pub 17 points 3 weeks ago

Sell them to someone who will test and resell them to the airline or medical industry... Manufacturing is a likely customer as well, plenty of legacy equipment there that's airgapped and still running decades-old hw/sw.

Youtube warning, some Boeing 747s

Recent BBC article

(This is a wrong answer since you only have a single pack. If you had several cases, you might actually be able to make a buck)

[-] ____@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

Saw a post on mastodon in the last day or so that someone dug up a network card for the old 486 they had been working on getting back to life. Might be a use case there, as well as in aviation and medicine - fields that move exceptionally slowly and tend to have expensive equipment with long lifetimes.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

Was always curious why there was an extra step to confirm when making a call through the GV app. Not using it anymore, but I see the logic behind requiring that confirmation.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago

Google Voice, with built-in dialer, voicemail, etc., was useful once upon a time, from when they acquired GrandCentral (original company) up through a few years ago.

Not so much anymore, just recently ported out the last couple of numbers I was using them for. I don't see much use case for replacing the dialer, except insofar as the ability to do so has value in terms of freedom and open markets.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's already trivial to get local banking details from many countries, (e.g., 'multi-currency' debit cards) but as far as I'm aware there's not a practical way to get a foreign debit card without the usual hoops that the full account would require.

Probably because demand for such a thing is low - I can generate disposable card numbers on the fly, but only from my home country. Can't imagine (aside from this specific edge case in question) generating foreign card numbers would be all that useful most of the time.

End-user support for such a thing would also be a challenge - I'm very accustomed to entering the usual data points with my card, but users would forget the associated postal code, or any number of other things, and then call support whining that it's 'broken'.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

IOW, not something that one stuck in Ameristan can realistically override. Damn.

A handful of those factors are fairly trivial, but addressing all of them concurrently sounds like a tall order - especially since presumably one can't talk to countryd directly and feed it the desired data.

Appreciate the clarity - iOS just isn't a platform I have a need or the tools to code in.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

I use Arch, btw...

Kidding, of course - but there are some of those folks out there. TBF, they're the vocal minority, but they are vocal nonetheless.

[-] ____@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago

There really is a dearth of choices. I’ve little love for Google’s version of android, mostly for privacy reasons.

If I could get a decent phone that ran at reasonable speed for a tolerable price, without the tracking, I’d be willing to give it a go - and endure more than a few pain points.

26
submitted 10 months ago by ____@infosec.pub to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Tired of wondering when the Big G will kill off GV, and now I also find myself needing to port a number quickly so I don't lose it (damned MFA backup SMS!).

3 numbers, a fax would be nice though I can take it or leave it. Basic autoattendant would be nice, voicemail and transcription, etc.

Really, I'm just looking for the features that have been bundled for years on the consumer side, and without nickling/diming me to death on it - and without Google.

Amazon's call center product is interesting, but more than a little heavy for me. I hate to go all-in on a self-hosted PBX when I don't really have the need. Not to mention I've still got to pay for the DID if I do that..

Used RingCentral for many years, and wasn't impresses. That was a while back, I hear they've improved somewhat, but the experience still left a bad taste.

view more: next ›

____

joined 11 months ago