sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's interesting, I'm an EE but in industry atm. I'd like to look into that whole scenario one day and see how much storage we'd need to go fully renewable.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because it's not good for productive economies that can produce solutions to current problems to stagnate and die. Japan should make moves to encourage a sustainable population growth rate.

Overpopulation is a problem mostly in struggling economies.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure that's a lemmy.ml thing because they are a bunch of pussies lol

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Hexbear is left wing.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. A lot of people fail to see this.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They are talking about on a smart TV.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Lol mr computer science engineer

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lol exactly, thank you for reminding me why I hate that phrase so much 🤣

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

South Australia is 70% renewables, as per their own official energy site.

Batteries are the limiting factor for renewables. Building battery storage that can supply a large city is expensive. Even the battery South Australia had Elon Musk build can only supply a town for about an hour. I'm hoping battery tech improves soon, but it seems to have stagnated for a while.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They never said that it's 90% recyclable. They said it can be recycled 'to an extent'. You're projecting.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, I too remember when the BBC openly advocated rape and lynching.

[-] ZodiacSF1969@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Lol, what do you disagree about? Is a 1.5°C rise apocalyptic?

view more: next ›

ZodiacSF1969

joined 1 year ago