sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] Zink@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

There are places like that, even with YouTube, but you usually have to pay rather than use the ad-supported free product. (Assuming ad blockers don’t work well any longer)

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think I have like 5 Lemmy apps installed, including the voyager web app, but I keep coming back to Memmy.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah well, it figures they have a tradeoff like that. Maybe they’ll be limited to remote locations then.

Like so many things, it will come down to cost. It’s fortunate that renewables are getting so much cheaper because we pretty much are betting on them by being so reluctant to expand nuclear. Hopefully batteries and other energy storage technologies keep advancing rapidly.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We should be investing in this amazing science!

Oh but fuck that other amazing science over there that everybody is into.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is awesome to see, but I wonder if an array of Small Modular Reactors would be the way to do it in the future. Nuclear is a fantastic and safe source of clean energy, so I hope it can compete better on the economic side.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely right! It can be a pretty great crutch, used sporadically, but constant use signals something else to work on. And depending on the issue, constant use can just make it slightly more comfortable to stay in that crappy state. (Ask me how I know, lol)

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Over here on Memmy you can fullscreen and resize it pretty seamlessly.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

No argument here. The wasteful and dangerous vehicles are just a minor symptom of our cultural issues.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

There is a lot of anger, frustration, and unacknowledged insecurity going into vehicle purchases in the US.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Instances have to be created and run by somebody, so we automatically have a bunch of admins in the loop.

Then somebody has to make communities on the instances. That involves choosing the purpose of the community, and writing any relevant description or guidelines. So again you inherently start with somebody in charge of the community.

But none of them answer to a corporate overlord. Things are run the way the people decide. And if the people disagree, they can run different communities or instances. There can easily be unmoderated communities, and I’m sure there are.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We may be thinking of different populations of users. The folks using Lemmy right now don’t really need much help to get what they want out of it. But if the fediverse is to grow, even if it never hits Reddit/Facebook/etc numbers, its developers should look at ways to decrease friction to getting the best experience.

And to be clear, I did not mean to argue that redundant communities are a problem. I can just see potential benefits of allowing cross-instance merger of communities IF the leaders of those communities decide they want to.

There undoubtedly IS strength in redundant communities, just as there is with all the different instances to choose from. One mod, one admin, one hardware failure or seized server, etc cannot just shut things down. Plus competition is good. There can be a natural selection process to determine over time which community is the best run.

But thanks to the network effect, there is also a first mover advantage, and an inertia to whichever community gets the most users at the beginning, since many people will just sub to the one or two most active communities on a subject. It would be interesting too see how, and IF, such a “merge communities” feature would be used by like-minded communities/mods. That kind of feature would/should be low priority in these early days though.

[-] Zink@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It all comes down to the network effect that I mentioned. It’s not a matter of making the users’ lives easier, it’s a matter of making the content better, especially the comments.

A single merged community may kick off discussions and debates that would never happen if the users were spread across 10 different communities in different instances.

I mean, maybe the conversations would still happen if everybody subscribed all 10 of the instances’ communities. If everybody interested in, say, photography subbed to every photography community out there, you’d basically have the same effect as merging. But people won’t do that. Some will, but I bet most won’t.

view more: next ›

Zink

joined 1 year ago