The point of my hypothetical is that communicable diseases have a tendency to evolve to be less pathogenic over time.
That's not actually a real thing. It was a theory by a guy in the 1800s that's been soundly debunked but spread because people want to believe it's true.
And notably they're not really two entirely unrelated things. "SARS" is SARS-CoV-1 and "COVID" is SARS-CoV-2.
Office buildings are test tubes, schools are petri dishes.
Polling generally showed Democrats supporting masking by a massive margin. The most recent poll I could find (April 2022) had support for mandatory masking on public transportation among Democrats as 80-5.
What's the point of this hypothetical? It's both not remotely close to where we are currently and has redefined the consequences to absurdity.
"Would you still wear a mask if the consequence of infection was a single light sneeze?"
"Would you wear a seat belt if the only consequence of car crashes was a small bruise?"
And those were the good old days when they were just trying to be subtly racist, rather than the now times where they're just straight up trying to smuggle Nazi dog whistles in.
And pair that with the government saying it's mostly killing old people and those with health issues then just declaring it over. I wasn't expecting lockdown forever, but just like keeping it as an ongoing health concern. Instead they've been wiping their site of tracking, dropping funding, and abandoning workers to just hope their employer isn't going to get them sick. COVID being over is good politically and good for business, so COVID is over.
It's not like the rich countries are self-evidently sober and stable in their politics and climate impacts. The richest one just had their own wannabe fascist and has both been responsible for a large part of emissions and rarely met their climate goals.
The problem is that the regulations drop off in this one particular niche that requires/encourages larger vehicles, not that the regulations exist in the first place.
I didn't abandon it. If they wait and see and hexbear's users do keep the dirtbag shit to local, then they should. I just won't really care that much if they don't.
Fucking lol. This has to trolling too. No chapo could possibly be surprised people think of them as trolls. Most of them are proud of it.
This is the same argument about banning on Reddit, but as a former mod, my experience is that very few people will actually go through the effort to spin up an alt to keep trolling. A handful will (we had one person who put a note in their calendar to send a "mean" modmail every month for a weirdly long time), but most are just lazy bored posters who have fun messing with people they don't like, and if they can't conveniently browse their targets for opportunities, they'll just go do something else they find fun rather than go through the effort. Despite accounts being basically free and meaningless, banning trolls was unexpectedly effective.