sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I doubt it. Other forms of AI could be useful, but generative AI? I doubt it.

And tbh even deep learning through neural networks doesn't seem to be making the leaps we'd hoped for. AoE4 promised, prior to release, a machine learning–based AI would be delivered down the line. It's now almost 3 years since release and we haven't heard a thing about it.

Maybe eventually we'll be able to easily train a machine learning algorithm to play any game at a wide variety of skill levels (or at a very high level, if not at customisable levels), but it doesn't seem like it's any time soon.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

A century or so of oppressed masses and greedy elites did it.

True, and that's important context if you're trying to get a deeper understanding of how Julius Caesar came to have the power he held before his assassination.

But there's enough of a problem you can see even if you just start at Julius, which is what I was concentrating on in my previous comment. The parallels to Trump are terrifyingly on the nose.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 45 points 4 days ago

It literally was though. Not a military intelligence tool, but a big business intelligence one.

Niantic was founded by Google and their first product, Field Trip, and their first game, Ingress (a much better-designed game than Pokémon Go, btw) were pretty obviously about gaining geolocation data for Google to improve their products like Maps and Shopping.

282
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Honestly I'm a light hobbyist myself. My exposure to history is primarily via YouTube channels like the excellent Historia Civilis (their series on Julius Caesar and the downfall of the Roman Republic is stunning) and via games like Age of Empires.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 50 points 5 days ago

I just don't understand how someone interested in antiquity can possibly fall for Trumpism. The fall of the Roman Republic was presaged by a guy literally trying to get elected to office so that he could escape prosecution for illegal abuses of power, and the legal system standing aside and saying "yeah, we'll let you do that in order to maintain the peace" and then falling into civil war anyway.

How much of that sounds familiar..?

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ok this got a chuckle out of me. But yeah, I don't see any problem with people expressing agreement verbally.

Imagine a real conversation where you're only allowed to agree with someone with nods, never saying "yeah I agree completely" or any other verbal feedback.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Honestly I didn't even read the article. Shared it purely based on the headline.

385
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

You say "handful", but it still hand thousands of players, and the thing that makes me sad about this screw up is that of those who played it, it was probably someone's favourite game…

…Is what I was going to say, until I looked at the Steam charts. It hit an all-time peak of 607 players, with estimates of total ownership ranging from 9.5k to 25.1k. It very well still may have been someone's favourite game and I feel really sad for them that it's gone, but wow the game still did so much worse than even my expectations based on the reporting.

230
submitted 1 week ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/games@lemmy.world
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

See this, this I get. This is an actual reasonable problem. And we could be talking about it wrt Retold, since Freyr is a day one DLC.

Personally I'm not too concerned with it because even if you ignore Freyr, the cost of Premium is $25 AUD more than standard, and it includes two future DLCs (which they've already said will be $15 USD, probably $20 AUD each). So Premium is worth getting just for the two future pantheons. And since Premium includes Freyr in addition to the future pantheons, it ends up not looking like an added cost in the way it would otherwise.

But it still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth that there's actual playable content not included for free that's available day one. And it would leave me very angry if the prices had ended up such that the best deal for everything except the day-one DLC actually cost less than the best deal for everything including Freyr. But all this discussion about cosmetics. Not even interesting cosmetics like unit skins, but something that's basically just profile pictures. Is annoyingly distracting from that conversation.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

You buy it for the expansions. The Chinese, one more as-yet-unannounced pantheon, and Freyr. The other stuff you get with Premium is basically irrelevant.

I'd much rather have a conversation about the day-one DLC of Freyr, and the fact that they're charging for the future Chinese pantheon despite Chinese being available in 2014 Extended Edition and no previous Age of Empires Definitive Edition removing a civ that was previously available (indeed, aoe2 and aoe3's DEs both added new civs in addition to all the existing ones). Granted, there are extenuating circumstances there, in that the EE Chinese DLC was so terrible it basically killed the game and they've promised the upcoming expansion to Retold will be "all new Chinese". But it still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth.

This discussion about what is basically profile pictures is some irrelevant bullshit as far as I'm concerned. I don't give a shit about it, and I find the rhetoric from people claiming they do care (especially that one person claiming that this is a reason they'll avoid Retold entirely because it's "an advertisement, not a game") extremely unconvincing. It's eye-rollingly stupid to care about this when there are real things to get upset about both with this game and in the wider gaming industry.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

where I’m actually playing a game and not an advertisement

That's more than a little bit hyperbolic.

107
137
submitted 4 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/games@sh.itjust.works
135
submitted 4 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/games@lemmy.world
134

Though it seemed completely automated, Just Walk Out relied on more than 1,000 people in India watching and labeling videos to ensure accurate checkouts.

253
submitted 6 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
343
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Shared on Facebook with the caption "Doing absolutely no favours to their international reputation, Americans have swarmed social media posts of Taylor Swift’s Melbourne concerts confused by a very obvious detail. Can you spot it?"

It's an article from the Murdoch right-wing paper "The Australian", so I won't link the original source.

Transcription:

Aerial photo of the Melbourne Cricket Ground, surrounded to its North and East by tree-filled parks, to the West by a warm-up pitch, and to the South by a train line with two pedestrian overpasses over it. Underneath this photo is the article title "The MCG show detail that has American Swifties baffled" and byline "by Sam McPhee".

49
submitted 8 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
85
submitted 8 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
18
submitted 1 year ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/homelab@lemmy.ml

Basically, I'm building a home and getting it wired with Ethernet cabling. I didn't want to get too much into the technical details, so I just provided the builders with locations where I want RJ45 ports, along with one spot where I just said "24-port patch panel" (the number of ports located elsewhere being 22.

I did some Googling and figured the patch panel should cost at most $150 in hardware costs (I found plenty of sub-$100 options, but a couple of more expensive ones and would not have been . I didn't mention anything about needing a rack because I thought it would be something that could just go directly in the wall. (And then I could buy a switch and use it to connect pretty much all the ports from the patch panel to the router.)

The builder came back to me with an estimated cost of:

  • $465 for a server cabinet: SEVCBN -6RU – 66WM
  • $567 for a patch panel: NCO760242563
  • $148 install charge

They gave me specific model numbers for the patch panel and server cabinet, but I can't find information about whether that's the actual cost of them, because the costs are locked behind having an account with the B2B retailers.

Does their proposed patch panel costing about 4x what I was expecting actually seem likely to give any value? Is there are explanation for that cost?

Secondary question: is having a wall-mounted cabinet worthwhile? How will it work in terms of installing a switch and connecting from the patch panel to the switch?

Thanks!

view more: next ›

Zagorath

joined 1 year ago