sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's ridiculous

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's complete nonsense, so many options out there. Samsung sucks I agree though.

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'm so embarrassed for my countrymen as well, is this really how we want to be represented?

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I mean that seems reasonably punishing yeah, not nearly the hours worth of profit usually charged to companies breaking the law. I believe the EU can even enforce its own content moderation on the site and charge the costs of that to Musk so its pointless for a company to not follow the laws at that point ...

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

He's talking about tactical nukes though, not strategic ones. The exercises he's talking about would be to practice using small scale nukes to secure battlefield "victories" (batshit insanity).

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Nope, it's 40 billion dollars, 4 billion as it stands rn.

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It's really not if you know anything

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It can be strongly correlated, meaning there's a definite relationship between them, while still being not significant like 3.6 min over a week. Most things that you hear cause cancer are only ~ .1 % extra probability over a lifetime but still highly correlated.

[-] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

USBC is so much better though, never had one break on me ever.

WEFshill202

joined 1 year ago