sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 2 points 10 months ago

Cryptography. As in, using encryption and encryption keys to authenticate me, rather than just a password.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 12 points 10 months ago

Last week or two I've been learning more about passkeys, and it makes threads like this seem ridiculously out of date. Given the choice between emojis and passwords and hard crypto, I'll take the crypto.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah that was also just a shitty phone- big heavy phone that's a mediocre phone but only needs charging once every few days.

I'm saying make a GOOD phone, maybe 10-12mm thick, and you can get a phone that lasts at least two full days.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 3 points 10 months ago

For the batteries your outta luck for now due to a SOB called physics.

How so? Give the battery more volume. Bigger battery = more mAh = lasts longer.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah but if you make the battery 3-4mm thicker you double its volume and then you have a phone with 5000-10000+ mAh.

You don't think 'this phone battery lasts a week' is a selling point? Trust me, it is.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Then get yourself a basic black & white laser printer. Brother is usually pretty good for that. The cartridges don't expire and it'll be ready instantly when you need it, whether that's tomorrow or next year.

Here's one for $120

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 29 points 10 months ago

What bugs me about this is THEY ARE ALL THE SAME! Flat rectangular phones with no buttons and few ports. Where is the innovation? Where is the experimentation? Where are the different form factors?

Go back to like 2003 and you had all kinds of variety in the market. Some phones had slide out keyboards, some had physical keyboards like blackberries, they were all kinds of different expansion ports and slots and interfaces, and occasionally something totally different like Compaq had a gadget that took different backpacks that bolted on the back to give it extra capability.

Skip 20 years ahead to today, and every phone is the exact same fucking form factor. And so we obsess over millimeters and megapixels and software. There's no innovation here. There's no variety here.

The only even slightly interesting development I see is the new flip and book phones, but that technology is being used in the most boring way possible. I want to phone the size of a Snickers bar where I pull the screen out of it from the side and it unrolls as far as I want it to. I want a phone that flips open like a laptop to reveal a keyboard. Or even simpler, I want a phone that's 4 mm thicker and has a battery that lasts all week. Give that phone a headphone jack and wireless charging, put a little rubber around it to make it indestructible, then you'll have something interesting.

Until that happens, you have like six manufacturers that are basically building the exact same product. Boring.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 2 points 10 months ago

And that's exactly why Ukraine is kicking ass. Paying $20k or $30k for a single enemy casualty is a pretty good deal in warfare. But these drones aren't going through some huge defense contractor, they're being 3D printed and assembled from off-the-shelf parts. Basically a little army of logistics people building hobby drones out of consumer level equipment, just with an improvised explosive like a grenade or some similar impact explosive strapped to the bottom.
They aren't even paying $20k for a casualty, they are paying $1-2k for a hobby drone and a grenade and many of them create multiple casualties.

The more expensive ones cost more, but those are the ones you see that are reusable and can drop several grenades in one flight. Those are more like $5k-$20k. Still an insane bargain even if each one only creates one casualty before it is destroyed.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 16 points 10 months ago

IT person here. Avoiding HP is a good idea. But a better idea is don't buy shitty cheap consumer level inkjet printers from any brand. Most of them have this sort of bullshit, although not usually as bad as HP does. Instead I suggest buy it for life. Get a nice color laser machine, spend a few hundred bucks, and you will have a printer that lasts until you die. I like the Canon MF743CDw, it's a little on the pricier side but it scans both sides of the paper in one pass. Also does color duplex printing.

If you don't want the extra size or weight of a color laser, get a black and white laser. How often do you really need color? And if you must get something cheaper, get one of the newer inkjet printers that use refillable ink bottles rather than cartridges, like there is an actual ink tank on the printer and you refill it with a squeeze bottle rather than replacing the cartridge.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 5 points 11 months ago

It's a good theory, but why were they shooting at civilian cars then?

I think your theory may make more sense than most (explains the abductions) but it still mostly seems nonsensical.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 1 points 11 months ago

I think a broad look at Israel's policies is long overdue in a few areas.
But this action virtually guarantees that won't happen.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah I think indoor farming / vertical farming is going to be the ultimate answer. Much more efficient in every way, including resource use, water, pesticide, etc.

view more: next ›

SirEDCaLot

joined 1 year ago